Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20054349›Full record

ArticleJournal of human hypertension2010

Switching of antihypertensive drugs among 93,286 Chinese patients: a cohort study.

M C S Wong, J Y Jiang, S M Griffiths

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M C S WongFaculty of Medicine, School of Public Health and Department of Community and Family Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Beijing, China.
J Y Jiang
S M Griffiths

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antihypertensive drug switching induces substantial public health costs. This cohort study evaluated factors associated with switching of antihypertensive agents 180 days after the first date of prescription among ethnic Chinese patients. We included all adult patients aged > or =18 years, who had paid at least two consecutive visits to all public primary care clinics in one large territory of Hong Kong during the study period from January 2004 to June 2007. Binary logistic regression analyses were carried out with antihypertensive drug switching as an outcome variable, while controlling for age, gender, payment status, service types, district of residence, visit types and the number of comorbidities. Among 93,286 eligible patients, 5281 (5.7%) switched their antihypertensive prescriptions to another drug class within 180 days. Patients aged > or =70 years (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.88, P=0.005), male subjects (aOR 0.87, P<0.001) and follow-up visitors (aOR 0.67, P<0.001) were less likely to have their drugs switched. When compared with thaizide diuretics, all other antihypertensive drug classes were associated with a lower likelihood of drug switching (aOR 0.27-0.69, all P<0.001). Closer observations of drug utilization profiles among these patient groups are recommended, and future studies should evaluate the reasons for drug switching.

Indexed as

Drug SubstitutionPractice Patterns, Physicians'AgedAge FactorsAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureChinaChi-Square DistributionCohort StudiesDrug PrescriptionsFemaleHumansHypertensionLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID20054349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.