Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20054335›Full record

ReviewJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2010

Does IVIg administration yield improved immune function in very premature neonates?

J L Wynn, P C Seed, C M Cotten

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Why are preterm newborns at increased risk of infection?Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2018
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Role of innate immunity in neonatal infection.American journal of perinatology · 2013
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J L WynnDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA. james.wynn@duke.edu
P C Seed
C M Cotten
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) has been evaluated as an adjunctive therapy for neonatal sepsis with modest clinical success despite strong biological plausibility. Multiple factors contribute to this outcome, but perhaps none greater than the limited immune system function in newborns, especially in the very premature neonates. For very premature neonates (<30 weeks gestational age), understanding the effects of IVIg on specific immature immune system functions is particularly relevant given their preponderance to develop sepsis and therefore potentially benefit from IVIg-mediated immunoenhancement. Here, we review the available evidence for enhanced immune function after IVIg administration in very premature neonates and highlight areas for future research.

Indexed as

Antibody-Dependent Cell CytotoxicityHumansImmune SystemImmunoglobulins, IntravenousImmunologic FactorsImmunomodulationInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInfant, Premature, DiseasesPhagocytosisSepsisImmunoglobulins, IntravenousImmunologic Factors

Identifiers

PMID20054335
OpenAlexW2042617477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.