Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20053562›Full record

ArticleBioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters2010

Predictive screening model for potential vector-mediated transport of cationic substrates at the blood-brain barrier choline transporter.

Werner J Geldenhuys, Vamshi K Manda, Rajendar K Mittapalli, Cornelis J Van der Schyf, Peter A Crooks, Linda P Dwoskin, David D Allen, Paul R Lockman

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Werner J GeldenhuysDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, School of Pharmacy, Amarillo, TX 79106-1712, USA. ingo.ott@tu-bs.de
Vamshi K Manda
Rajendar K Mittapalli
Cornelis J Van der Schyf
Peter A Crooks
Linda P Dwoskin
David D Allen
Paul R Lockman

Funding

Developmemt of Novel Treatments for Nicotine AddictionU19DA017548 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI DWOSKIN, LINDA P · 2003 to 2007
$6.0M
NIDA NIH HHS U19 DA017548
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A set of semi-rigid cyclic and acyclic bis-quaternary ammonium analogs, which were part of a drug discovery program aimed at identifying antagonists at neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, were investigated to determine structural requirements for affinity at the blood-brain barrier choline transporter (BBB CHT). This transporter may have utility as a drug delivery vector for cationic molecules to access the central nervous system. In the current study, a virtual screening model was developed to aid in rational drug design/ADME of cationic nicotinic antagonists as BBB CHT ligands. Four 3D-QSAR comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) models were built which could predict the BBB CHT affinity for a test set with an r(2) <0.5 and cross-validated q(2) of 0.60, suggesting good predictive capability for these models. These models will allow the rapid in silico screening of binding affinity at the BBB CHT of both known nicotinic receptor antagonists and virtual compound libraries with the goal of informing the design of brain bioavailable quaternary ammonium analogs that are high affinity selective nicotinic receptor antagonists.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularAnimalsBiological TransportBlood-Brain BarrierCationsDrug Delivery SystemsMaleMembrane Transport ProteinsPredictive Value of TestsRatsRats, Inbred F344Substrate SpecificityCationscholine transporterMembrane Transport Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20053562
PMCPMC2818856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.