Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20052587›Full record

Trial reportEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2010

Ribosomal therapy in the treatment of recurrent acute adenoiditis.

Renzo Mora, Massimo Dellepiane, Barbara Crippa, Luca Guastini, Valentina Santomauro, Angelo Salami

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Immunostimulants for preventing respiratory tract infection in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2006
    Pooled it
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Renzo MoraENT Department, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy. renzomora@libero.it
Massimo Dellepiane
Barbara Crippa
Luca Guastini
Valentina Santomauro
Angelo Salami
University of Genoa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of an oral ribosomal immunotherapy in the management of children with recurrent acute adenoiditis (RAA). 60 children with RAA were included and randomly assigned into two groups (group A and B). Group A children underwent ribosomal prophylaxis, while group B received a placebo. Before, at the end and 6 months after start of the therapy, children underwent medical history, ENT examination, plasma levels of immunoglobulins class E, A, G, M (IgE, IgA, IgG, IgM), tympanometry, active anterior rhinomanometry and VAS scores by children' parents. After the treatment and at the end of the study, in the group A, the serum concentration of IgE was significantly (P < 0.05) lower than in group B (77.34 +/- 6.23 vs. 95.49 +/- 7.07 mg/dl; 74.82 +/- 6.26 vs. 94.44 +/- 7.44 mg/dl), IgA titers were significantly (P < 0.05) higher than in group B (312.04 +/- 18.41 vs. 213.20 +/- 11.82; 309.07 +/- 18.33 vs. 211.73 +/- 11.54 mg/dl) as well as serum concentration of IgG (1401.12 +/- 118.81 vs. 1101.81 +/- 109.64 mg/dl; 1412.19 +/- 116.43 vs. 1144.06 +/- 103.58 mg/dl). At the end of the study, comparison between the two groups showed, in group A: 77% of children (n = 23), versus 23% (n = 7) of group B, with a type A tympanogram; significant (P < 0.05) nasal flow decrease at the rhinomanometric measures; VAS scores were significantly (P < 0.05) improved (1.8 +/- 0.22 vs. 5.1 +/- 0.59) and frequency, severity and social impact of RAA episodes were significantly (P < 0.05) lower than group B. Our results show the therapeutic effectiveness of this approach in the prophylaxis of recurrent acute adenoiditis.

Indexed as

AdenoidsAcoustic Impedance TestsAdolescentAntigens, BacterialChildDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunoglobulin EImmunoglobulinsImmunologic FactorsMaleNasopharyngitisPain MeasurementAntigens, BacterialImmunoglobulin EImmunoglobulinsImmunologic FactorsRibomunyl

Identifiers

PMID20052587
OpenAlexW1992019058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.