ArticleInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2010
Rewarding and unrewarding aspects of deployment to Iraq and its association with psychological health in UK military personnel.
Article in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- The mental health of the UK Armed Forces: where facts meet fiction.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2014Article
- Prevalence, incidence and determinants of PTSD and other mental disorders: design and methods of the PID-PTSD+3 study.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeResearch into how individuals perceive their deployment experiences is important for understanding the association between stressful events and subsequent positive or negative effects. This study examines perceptions among UK military personnel with regard to rewarding and unrewarding aspects of deployment in Iraq.
methodsAnalyses were carried out on 5,573 UK military personnel who had deployed to Iraq between 2003 and 2006. Information on socio-demographic and military characteristics; deployment experiences, including perceptions of rewarding and unrewarding aspects of service; and information on current health, were collected with questionnaires. Associations between deployment and health factors, and participants' perceptions of service were examined.
resultsThe rewarding aspects of deployment were related to military tasks such as "doing the job you were trained to do", "teamwork/comradeship" and altruistic aspects such as "helping local people". The unrewarding aspects were "being separated from family and friends" and "quality of supply and equipment". Although there was general agreement on the aspects that mattered to most Service personnel, there were differences associated with operation deployed to, enlistment type, rank, service and psychological health. Those with a psychological problem were more likely to find most military aspects of deployment unrewarding but were more likely to find helping the local population and working with other coalition forces rewarding.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates how the perceptions of deployment, in terms of rewarding and unrewarding aspects, are shaped by service characteristics, mental health and operation deployed to.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.