Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20052479›Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2010

Natriuretic peptides in the detection of preclinical diastolic or systolic dysfunction.

Claus Luers, Rolf Wachter, Sibylle Kleta, Marc Uhlir, Janka Koschack, Martin Scherer, Lutz Binder, Christoph Herrmann-Lingen, Antonia Zapf, Bettina Kulle and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.

Claus LuersDepartment of Cardiology and Pneumology, University of Goettingen, Germany. cluers@gwdg.de
Rolf Wachter
Sibylle Kleta
Marc Uhlir
Janka Koschack
Martin Scherer
Lutz Binder
Christoph Herrmann-Lingen
Antonia Zapf
Bettina Kulle
Michael M Kochen
Burkert Pieske
University of Göttingen · DEUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe diagnostic value of natriuretic peptides in asymptomatic patients at risk for diastolic or systolic HF is controversial. We tested (1) the prevalence of preclinical LV dysfunction in an at-risk cohort; (2) the diagnostic accuracy of natriuretic peptides alone or in combination with clinical parameters for predicting asymptomatic left ventricular systolic or diastolic dysfunction.

methods542 primary care patients (mean age 63 +/- 11 years, 42% female) without prediagnosed HF, but with risk factors for left ventricular dysfunction, underwent thorough cardiological workup, including echocardiography and analysis of natriuretic peptides.

results23 patients (4%) showed reduced systolic function (EF < 50%), and 15 patients (3%) had severe diastolic dysfunction. All natriuretic peptides significantly increased with decreasing ejection fraction and with increasing degree of diastolic dysfunction. For natriuretic peptides, receiver operating characteristics analysis yielded good results for the detection of systolic dysfunction or severe diastolic dysfunction. Combining clinical parameters with natriuretic peptide data improved the diagnostic accuracy and largely reduced the number of needed screening echoes to identify patients with LV systolic or diastolic dysfunction.

conclusionsThe prevalence of preclinical diastolic dysfunction is high in primary care patients at risk, but the relative prevalence of severe diastolic dysfunction and systolic dysfunction is only 7%. High-risk individuals may be screened most efficiently by using a score system incorporating clinical data and NT-proBNP.

Indexed as

AgedDiastoleEchocardiographyHeart Failure, DiastolicHeart Failure, SystolicHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMass ScreeningMiddle AgedNatriuretic PeptidesPrevalencePrimary Health CareProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexSystoleNatriuretic Peptides

Identifiers

PMID20052479
PMCPMC2842879
OpenAlexW2037820727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.