Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20052272›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2010

Ultradeep sequencing of a human ultraconserved region reveals somatic and constitutional genomic instability.

Anna De Grassi, Cinzia Segala, Fabio Iannelli, Sara Volorio, Lucio Bertario, Paolo Radice, Loris Bernard, Francesca D Ciccarelli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The mystery of extreme non-coding conservation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2013
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna De GrassiDepartment of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Cinzia Segala
Fabio Iannelli
Sara Volorio
Lucio Bertario
Paolo Radice
Loris Bernard
Francesca D Ciccarelli
European Institute of Oncology · ITFIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology · ITHereditary Disease Foundation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early detection of cancer-associated genomic instability is crucial, particularly in tumour types in which this instability represents the essential underlying mechanism of tumourigenesis. Currently used methods require the presence of already established neoplastic cells because they only detect clonal mutations. In principle, parallel sequencing of single DNA filaments could reveal the early phases of tumour initiation by detecting low-frequency mutations, provided an adequate depth of coverage and an effective control of the experimental error. We applied ultradeep sequencing to estimate the genomic instability of individuals with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). To overcome the experimental error, we used an ultraconserved region (UCR) of the human genome as an internal control. By comparing the mutability outside and inside the UCR, we observed a tendency of the ultraconserved element to accumulate significantly fewer mutations than the flanking segments in both neoplastic and nonneoplastic HNPCC samples. No difference between the two regions was detectable in cells from healthy donors, indicating that all three HNPCC samples have mutation rates higher than the healthy genome. This is the first, to our knowledge, direct evidence of an intrinsic genomic instability of individuals with heterozygous mutations in mismatch repair genes, and constitutes the proof of principle for the development of a more sensitive molecular assay of genomic instability.

Indexed as

Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisConserved SequenceDNA, NeoplasmDNA RepairFemaleGenesGenes, NeoplasmGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenomic InstabilityHeterozygoteHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSensitivity and SpecificityDNA, Neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID20052272
PMCPMC2794366
OpenAlexW2089907487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.