Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20051991›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2010

Frequent genetic differences between matched primary and metastatic breast cancer provide an approach to identification of biomarkers for disease progression.

Andrzej B Popławski, Michał Jankowski, Stephen W Erickson, Teresita Díaz de Ståhl, E Christopher Partridge, Chiquito Crasto, Jingyu Guo, John Gibson, Uwe Menzel, Carl Eg Bruder and 11 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. An engineered niche delineates metastatic potential of breast cancer.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. The Clinical Significance of Genetic Variation in Ovarian Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. The genomic regulation of metastatic dormancy.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Evolution of early phase clinical trials in oncology.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2018
    Review
  15. P-cadherin: a useful biomarker for axillary-based breast cancer decisions in the clinical practice.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Andrzej B PopławskiDepartment of Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Michał Jankowski
Stephen W Erickson
Teresita Díaz de Ståhl
E Christopher Partridge
Chiquito Crasto
Jingyu Guo
John Gibson
Uwe Menzel
Carl Eg Bruder
Aneta Kaczmarczyk
Magdalena Benetkiewicz
Robin Andersson
Johanna Sandgren
Barbara Zegarska
Dariusz Bała
Ewa Srutek
David B Allison
Arkadiusz Piotrowski
Wojciech Zegarski
Jan P Dumanski
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USUppsala University · SENicolaus Copernicus University · PLGdańsk Medical University · PLInserm · FR

Funding

UAB Statistical Genetics Post-Doctoral Training ProgramT32HL072757 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI TIWARI, HEMANT K. · 2003 to 2016
$3.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL072757
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in women and its metastatic spread is the principal reason behind the fatal outcome. Metastasis-related research of breast cancer is however underdeveloped when compared with the abundant literature on primary tumors. We applied an unexplored approach comparing at high resolution the genomic profiles of primary tumors and synchronous axillary lymph node metastases from 13 patients with breast cancer. Overall, primary tumors displayed 20% higher number of aberrations than metastases. In all but two patients, we detected in total 157 statistically significant differences between primary lesions and matched metastases. We further observed differences that can be linked to metastatic disease and there was also an overlapping pattern of changes between different patients. Many of the differences described here have been previously linked to poor patient survival, suggesting that this is a viable approach toward finding biomarkers for disease progression and definition of new targets useful for development of anticancer drugs. Frequent genetic differences between primary tumors and metastases in breast cancer also question, at least to some extent, the role of primary tumors as a surrogate subject of study for the systemic disease.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsChromosomes, Human, Pair 11DNA Copy Number VariationsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenome, HumanHumansLymphatic MetastasisMiddle AgedOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID20051991
PMCPMC2987320
OpenAlexW2091430335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.