SynthesisJAMA2010
Antidepressant drug effects and depression severity: a patient-level meta-analysis.
Synthesis in JAMA, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 633 papers, 28 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomised Double-Blinded Placebo-Controlled Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Scopolamine Compared to Placebo in Individuals With Bipolar Disorder Who Are Experiencing a Depressive Episode
Participatory System Dynamics vs Audit and Feedback: A Cluster Randomized Trial of Mechanisms of Implementation Change to Expand Reach of Evidence-based Addiction and Mental Health Care
Who cites it
633 citing papers in PubMed, 28 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,992 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of working memory training on depressive symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Translational psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Relative effectiveness of antidepressant treatments in treatment-resistant depression: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of passive immunotherapies targeting amyloid beta in Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Nature-based interventions: a systematic review of reviews.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Pooled it
- Prevalence of Antidepressant Prescriptions for Community-Dwelling Adults Diagnosed with Depressive Disorder in the UK: A Systematic Review.The Psychiatric quarterly · 2024Pooled it
- The safety and effectiveness of music medicine as an intervention for depression: A systematic evaluation and re-evaluation.Brain and behavior · 2024Pooled it
- The Effect of Placebo on Pruritus in Patients with Chronic Urticaria: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials.Clinical drug investigation · 2024Pooled it
- The effect of mindfulness meditation on depressive symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Pooled it
- The effectiveness of mind-body therapy and physical training in alleviating depressive symptoms in adult cancer patients: a meta-analysis.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Neural, Anti-Inflammatory, and Clinical Effects of Transauricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- Chinese herbal medicines for the treatment of depression: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- Effects and safety ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- Pharmacological, non-invasive brain stimulation and psychological interventions, and their combination, for treating depression after stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Can Extant Vaping Prevention Message Experiments Tell Us Something About What Works? A Response to O'Keefe.Health communication · 2023Pooled it
- Effectiveness of Pharmacotherapy for Depression after Adult Traumatic Brain Injury: an Umbrella Review.Neuropsychology review · 2023Pooled it
- Factors Related to Placebo Response in Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trials of Antidepressants in Children and Adolescents: A Meta-regression Analysis.Clinical drug investigation · 2023Pooled it
- Guideline
- Effects of virtual reality-based intervention on depression in stroke patients: a meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2023Pooled it
- Tai Chi Exercise for Mental and Physical Well-Being in Patients with Depressive Symptoms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Pooled it
- Magnitude of placebo response in clinical trials of paroxetine for vasomotor symptoms: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Pooled it
573 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
contextAntidepressant medications represent the best established treatment for major depressive disorder, but there is little evidence that they have a specific pharmacological effect relative to pill placebo for patients with less severe depression.
objectiveTo estimate the relative benefit of medication vs placebo across a wide range of initial symptom severity in patients diagnosed with depression. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched from January 1980 through March 2009, along with references from meta-analyses and reviews. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized placebo-controlled trials of antidepressants approved by the Food and Drug Administration in the treatment of major or minor depressive disorder were selected. Studies were included if their authors provided the requisite original data, they comprised adult outpatients, they included a medication vs placebo comparison for at least 6 weeks, they did not exclude patients on the basis of a placebo washout period, and they used the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS). Data from 6 studies (718 patients) were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Individual patient-level data were obtained from study authors.
resultsMedication vs placebo differences varied substantially as a function of baseline severity. Among patients with HDRS scores below 23, Cohen d effect sizes for the difference between medication and placebo were estimated to be less than 0.20 (a standard definition of a small effect). Estimates of the magnitude of the superiority of medication over placebo increased with increases in baseline depression severity and crossed the threshold defined by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence for a clinically significant difference at a baseline HDRS score of 25.
conclusionsThe magnitude of benefit of antidepressant medication compared with placebo increases with severity of depression symptoms and may be minimal or nonexistent, on average, in patients with mild or moderate symptoms. For patients with very severe depression, the benefit of medications over placebo is substantial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.