Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20050934›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2010

Comparison of health outcomes for male seniors in the Veterans Health Administration and Medicare Advantage plans.

Alfredo J Selim, Dan Berlowitz, Lewis E Kazis, William Rogers, Steven M Wright, Shirley X Qian, James A Rothendler, Avron Spiro, Donald Miller, Bernardo J Selim and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Comparing VA and Non-VA Quality of Care: A Systematic Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. The Impact of Executive Function on Retention and Compliance in Physical Therapy in Veterans.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. The Live Long Walk Strong Rehabilitation Program Study: Design and Methods.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Reliability & validity of the LIBRE Profile.Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries · 2018
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Patient preference and contraindications in measuring quality of care: what do administrative data miss?Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alfredo J SelimCenter for Health Quality, Outcomes & Economic Research, Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Hospital (152), Building 70, 200 Springs Road, Bedford, MA 01730, USA. alfredo.selim2@va.gov
Dan Berlowitz
Lewis E Kazis
William Rogers
Steven M Wright
Shirley X Qian
James A Rothendler
Avron Spiro
Donald Miller
Bernardo J Selim
Benjamin G Fincke

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) with the Medicare Advantage (MA) plans with regard to health outcomes. DATA SOURCES: The Medicare Health Outcome Survey, the 1999 Large Health Survey of Veteran Enrollees, and the Ambulatory Care Survey of Healthcare Experiences of Patients (Fiscal Years 2002 and 2003). STUDY

designA retrospective study. EXTRACTION

methodsMen 65+ receiving care in MA (N=198,421) or in VHA (N=360,316). We compared the risk-adjusted probability of being alive with the same or better physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) health at 2-years follow-up. We computed hazard ratio (HR) for 2-year mortality. PRINCIPAL

findingsVeterans had a higher adjusted probability of being alive with the same or better PCS compared with MA participants (VHA 69.2 versus MA 63.6 percent, p<.001). VHA patients had a higher adjusted probability than MA patients of being alive with the same or better MCS (76.1 versus 69.6 percent, p<.001). The HRs for mortality in the MA were higher than in the VHA (HR, 1.26 [95 percent CI 1.23-1.29]).

conclusionsOur findings indicate that the VHA has better patient outcomes than the private managed care plans in Medicare. The VHA's performance offers encouragement that the public sector can both finance and provide exemplary health care.

Indexed as

Health Status IndicatorsMedicare Part CUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsAgedAged, 80 and overAmbulatory CareHealth Care SurveysHumansMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CareQuality of Health CareRetrospective StudiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID20050934
PMCPMC2838151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.