Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20049941›Full record

ReviewJournal of pharmaceutical sciences2010

Delivery of therapeutic proteins.

Dipak S Pisal, Matthew P Kosloski, Sathy V Balu-Iyer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 154 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
154citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

154 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Liposomes from red betel (Open veterinary journal · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. MPETDrug delivery · 2023
    Article
  18. Smart nanoparticles for cancer therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023
    Review
  19. Enzyme Engineering Strategies for the Bioenhancement of L-Asparaginase Used as a Biopharmaceutical.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2023
    Review
  20. Review

94 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dipak S PisalDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 521 Hochstetter Hall, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Amherst, New York 14260, USA.
Matthew P Kosloski
Sathy V Balu-Iyer

Funding

HL-Development and Pharmacology of novel lipidic rAHF and biotherapeuticsR01HL070227 · NHLBI · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI BALU-IYER, SATHY VENKAT · 2002 to 2019
$5.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL-70227NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL070227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The safety and efficacy of protein therapeutics are limited by three interrelated pharmaceutical issues, in vitro and in vivo instability, immunogenicity and shorter half-lives. Novel drug modifications for overcoming these issues are under investigation and include covalent attachment of poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), polysialic acid, or glycolic acid, as well as developing new formulations containing nanoparticulate or colloidal systems (e.g., liposomes, polymeric microspheres, polymeric nanoparticles). Such strategies have the potential to develop as next generation protein therapeutics. This review includes a general discussion on these delivery approaches.

Indexed as

Chemistry, PharmaceuticalHalf-LifeHumansLiposomesMicrospheresNanoparticlesPolyethylene GlycolsPolymersProteinsSialic AcidsLiposomesPolyethylene GlycolsPolymerspolysialic acidProteinsSialic Acids

Identifiers

PMID20049941
PMCPMC2857543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.