Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20049616›Full record

ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2010

Single infusion of rituximab for persistent steroid-dependent minimal-change nephrotic syndrome after long-term cyclosporine.

Shuichiro Fujinaga, Daishi Hirano, Naoto Nishizaki, Koichi Kamei, Shuichi Ito, Yoshiyuki Ohtomo, Toshiaki Shimizu, Kazunari Kaneko

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Rituximab in steroid-dependent or frequently relapsing idiopathic nephrotic syndrome.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2014
    Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. [Efficacy and safety of rituximab in children with refractory nephrotic syndrome].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Shuichiro FujinagaDivision of Nephrology, Saitama Children's Medical Center, 2100 Magome, Iwatsuki-ward, Saitama-city, Saitama, 339 8551, Japan. f_shuich@d2.dion.ne.jp
Daishi Hirano
Naoto Nishizaki
Koichi Kamei
Shuichi Ito
Yoshiyuki Ohtomo
Toshiaki Shimizu
Kazunari Kaneko
Saitama Children's Medical Center · JPNational Center For Child Health and Development · JPJuntendo University · JPJuntendo University Nerima Hospital · JPKansai Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rituximab (RTX) has been successfully used as a rescue therapy in children with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS). However, little is known regarding maintenance therapy after a successful response to RTX in such patients. The efficacy and safety of a single RTX infusion (375 mg/m(2)) were assessed in ten patients who had persistent SDNS associated with minimal-change disease (MCD) despite the long-term use of cyclosporine (CsA). The mean follow-up after RTX infusion was 17 months. Applying RTX resulted in a significant reduction in the mean prednisolone (PSL) dose from 0.39 +/-0.18 to 0.15 +/- 0.14 mg/kg per day. The mean 12-month relapse rates significantly decreased from 4.1 +/- 1.7 to 0.6 +/- 0.6. All but one patient who had continued CsA as maintenance therapy after a single RTX infusion were able to withdraw from PSL without any relapses during the study period, whereas the remaining five patients who discontinued CsA experienced relapses after CD19 cells re-emerged, leading to the reintroduction of CsA or an additional RTX infusion. Infusion reactions occurred in five of ten patients. These data indicate that a single RTX infusion may improve response to CsA in patients with persistent SDNS due to the phenomenon of secondary resistance to CsA.

Indexed as

AdolescentAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAntigens, CD19Anti-Inflammatory AgentsChildChild, PreschoolCyclosporineDrug ResistanceFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsInfantLymphocytesMaleAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAntigens, CD19Anti-Inflammatory AgentsCyclosporineImmunosuppressive AgentsPrednisoloneRituximabSteroids

Identifiers

PMID20049616
OpenAlexW1988812807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.