Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20049321›Full record

ArticlePloS one2010

Differential impact of tumor suppressor pathways on DNA damage response and therapy-induced transformation in a mouse primary cell model.

A Kathleen McClendon, Jeffry L Dean, Adam Ertel, Erik S Knudsen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A Kathleen McClendonKimmel Cancer Center, Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Jeffry L Dean
Adam Ertel
Erik S Knudsen
Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center · USThomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

ENVIRONMETAL CARCINOGENESIS AND MUTAGENESIST32ES007250 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI MILLER, WILLIAM E · 1988 to 2024
$11.9M
RB-mediated replication controlR01CA106471 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI KNUDSEN, ERIK · 2004 to 2008
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS CA106471NCI NIH HHS R01 CA106471NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007250NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES07250-16
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The RB and p53 tumor suppressors are mediators of DNA damage response, and compound inactivation of RB and p53 is a common occurrence in human cancers. Surprisingly, their cooperation in DNA damage signaling in relation to tumorigenesis and therapeutic response remains enigmatic. In the context of individuals with heritable retinoblastoma, there is a predilection for secondary tumor development, which has been associated with the use of radiation-therapy to treat the primary tumor. Furthermore, while germline mutations of the p53 gene are critical drivers for cancer predisposition syndromes, it is postulated that extrinsic stresses play a major role in promoting varying tumor spectrums and disease severities. In light of these studies, we examined the tumor suppressor functions of these proteins when challenged by exposure to therapeutic stress. To examine the cooperation of RB and p53 in tumorigenesis, and in response to therapy-induced DNA damage, a combination of genetic deletion and dominant negative strategies was employed. Results indicate that loss/inactivation of RB and p53 is not sufficient for cellular transformation. However, these proteins played distinct roles in response to therapy-induced DNA damage and subsequent tumorigenesis. Specifically, RB status was critical for cellular response to damage and senescence, irrespective of p53 function. Loss of RB resulted in a dramatic evolution of gene expression as a result of alterations in epigenetic programming. Critically, the observed changes in gene expression have been specifically associated with tumorigenesis, and RB-deficient, recurred cells displayed oncogenic characteristics, as well as increased resistance to subsequent challenge with discrete therapeutic agents. Taken together, these findings indicate that tumor suppressor functions of RB and p53 are particularly manifest when challenged by cellular stress. In the face of such challenge, RB is a critical suppressor of tumorigenesis beyond p53, and RB-deficiency could promote significant cellular evolution, ultimately contributing to a more aggressive disease.

Indexed as

Cell Transformation, NeoplasticDNA DamageGenes, Tumor SuppressorModels, BiologicalAnimalsBase SequenceBlotting, WesternCell CycleCells, CulturedDNA PrimersGenes, p53Genes, RetinoblastomaMiceMutationOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionDNA Primers

Identifiers

PMID20049321
PMCPMC2796719
OpenAlexW2027992596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.