Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20049239›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2009

"This is public health: recycling counts!" Description of a pilot health communications campaign.

Nancy L Chase, Gregory M Dominick, Amy Trepal, Leanne S Bailey, Daniela B Friedman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nancy L ChaseDepartment of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208, USA. CHASEN@mailbox.sc.edu
Gregory M Dominick
Amy Trepal
Leanne S Bailey
Daniela B Friedman

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper describes the development, implementation, and evaluation of a pilot recycling campaign. The goal of the campaign was to increase people's awareness and knowledge about recycling and the link between a healthy environment and the public's health. A total of 258 individuals attended campaign week events and completed an initial survey. Results identified inconvenience of recycling facility locations as a key barrier to recycling. Post-campaign survey results revealed increased recycling of paper, plastic, glass, and cans (p < 0.05). The majority of participants "agreed" or "strongly agreed" that as a result of campaign messages they had greater awareness about recycling (88.4%) and their recycling efforts increased (61.6%).

Indexed as

AwarenessHealth PromotionProgram EvaluationPublic HealthRecyclingSocial MarketingData CollectionEnvironmental PollutionHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansPilot ProjectsProgram DevelopmentPublic Health PracticeRefuse Disposalenvironmenthealth communicationpublic healthrecycling

Identifiers

PMID20049239
PMCPMC2800327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.