Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20049171›Full record

ArticleJournal of oncology2009

Eosinophils and oral squamous cell carcinoma: a short review.

C P Martinelli-Kläy, B R R N Mendis, T Lombardi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oncology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Eosinophils in Oral Disease: A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Tumor eosinophil infiltration and improved survival of colorectal cancer patients: Iowa Women's Health Study.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C P Martinelli-KläyLaboratory of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Division of Stomatology and Oral Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.
B R R N Mendis
T Lombardi
University of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The eosinophil cell has been related as a prognostic indicator for cancers. However, its exact function in tumour behaviour is still not clearly defined. In the oral cavity the presence of eosinophils can be a favourable prognostic indicator as well as it may be associated with a poor prognosis. In this short review, we briefly summarize the role of the eosinophils in the general context of immunoregulation and its relation to oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Identifiers

PMID20049171
PMCPMC2798670
OpenAlexW2081085591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.