Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20049083›Full record

ReviewGerman medical science : GMS e-journal2009

Access technique and its problems in parenteral nutrition - Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition, Chapter 9.

K W Jauch, W Schregel, Z Stanga, S C Bischoff, P Brass, W Hartl, S Muehlebach, E Pscheidl, P Thul, O Volk and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in German medical science : GMS e-journal, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Pharmaceutical Aspects of Artificial Nutrition.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

K W JauchDept. Surgery Grosshadern, University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
W Schregel
Z Stanga
S C Bischoff
P Brass
W Hartl
S Muehlebach
E Pscheidl
P Thul
O Volk
Working group for developing the guidelines for parenteral nutrition of The German Association for Nutritional Medicine

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Catheter type, access technique, and the catheter position should be selected considering to the anticipated duration of PN aiming at the lowest complication risks (infectious and non-infectious). Long-term (>7-10 days) parenteral nutrition (PN) requires central venous access whereas for PN <3 weeks percutaneously inserted catheters and for PN >3 weeks subcutaneous tunnelled catheters or port systems are appropriate. CVC (central venous catheter) should be flushed with isotonic NaCl solution before and after PN application and during CVC occlusions. Strict indications are required for central venous access placement and the catheter should be removed as soon as possible if not required any more. Blood samples should not to be taken from the CVC. If catheter infection is suspected, peripheral blood-culture samples and culture samples from each catheter lumen should be taken simultaneously. Removal of the CVC should be carried out immediately if there are pronounced signs of local infection at the insertion site and/or clinical suspicion of catheter-induced sepsis. In case PN is indicated for a short period (max. 7-10 days), a peripheral venous access can be used if no hyperosmolar solutions (>800 mosm/L) or solutions with a high titration acidity or alkalinity are used. A peripheral venous catheter (PVC) can remain in situ for as long as it is clinically required unless there are signs of inflammation at the insertion site.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicCatheterization, Central VenousGermanyHumansNutrition DisordersParenteral Nutritioncatheter-related infectionscentral venous catheterhandling of central catheterin-line filterintravenous access

Identifiers

PMID20049083
PMCPMC2795383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.