Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20048711›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in HIV and AIDS2009

Defining treatment failure in resource-rich settings.

Jeannette L Aldous, Richard H Haubrich

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in HIV and AIDS, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. CD8Frontiers in immunology · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jeannette L AldousUniversity of California San Diego, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Antiretroviral Research Center (AVRC), San Diego, California 92103, USA.
Richard H Haubrich

Funding

VirologyP30AI036214 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI David Mitchell Smith · 1994 to 2026
$78.4M
UCSD Department of Medicine HIV/AIDS Clinical Trials UnitUM1AI069432 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI TIMOTHY J. WILKIN · 2012 to 2026
$50.4M
UCSD Department of Medicine HIV/AIDS Clinical Trials UnitU01AI069432 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BENSON, CONSTANCE ANN · 2007 to 2011
$19.3M
RESEARCH IN INFECTIOUS DISEASEST32AI007036 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI NIZET, VICTOR · 1985 to 2025
$9.2M
Improving Antiretroviral Management for HIVK24AI064086 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI HAUBRICH, RICHARD H · 2006 to 2015
$1.8M
Assessing the Clinical Consequences of HIV Drug ResistanceR21AI080397 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI HAUBRICH, RICHARD H · 2008 to 2009
$425k
NIAID NIH HHS AI 064086NIAID NIH HHS K24 AI064086NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI036214NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI080397NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007036NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI069432NIAID NIH HHS UCSD ACTU AI 69432NIAID NIH HHS UCSD CFAR AI 36214NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI069432
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTo define treatment failure in resource-rich settings; summarizing current guidelines, assays, the significance of detectable viremia, and definitions of treatment failure in clinical and research settings. RECENT

findingsThe goal of treatment should be full viral suppression, even in highly treatment-experienced patients. SUMMARY: Treatment failure is defined as repeated HIV RNA values above the lower limit of detection of a sensitive assay (usually 50 copies/ml). This criterion is based on evidence that the maximum clinical benefit of antiretroviral therapy is derived by keeping the viral load as low as possible. Full viral suppression should be achievable in all patients, both treatment-naïve and experienced. Transient, low-detectable viremia ('blips') may not predict virologic breakthrough. However, consecutive or higher-level transient viremia is associated with risk of treatment failure. Defining failure by a confirmed HIV RNA more than 50 copies/ml is the most conservative approach, but the use of such low limits of detection in clinical trials may lead to a high false-positive 'failure' rate, thus a definition of 200 copies/ml may be preferable. Variation in clinical trial endpoint definitions creates a challenge for comparing results between studies. For example, using a composite endpoint to define treatment failure may result in a high proportion of 'failures' that are not related to poor virologic response.

Indexed as

HIVHIV InfectionsHumansRNA, ViralTreatment FailureViral LoadRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID20048711
PMCPMC2946177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.