Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20048604›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery2010

Rodent facial nerve recovery after selected lesions and repair techniques.

Tessa A Hadlock, Jeffrey Kowaleski, David Lo, Susan E Mackinnon, James T Heaton

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Synaptic plasticity in the facial nucleus in rats following infraorbital nerve manipulation after facial nerve injury.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2016
    Article
  12. Optimal site for facial nerve transection and neurorrhaphy: a randomized prospective animal study.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale · 2015
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A system for delivering mechanical stimulation and robot-assisted therapy to the rat whisker pad during facial nerve regeneration.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2013
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tessa A HadlockBoston, Mass.; and St. Louis, Mo. From the Department of Otology and Laryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, the Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, and the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine.
Jeffrey Kowaleski
David Lo
Susan E Mackinnon
James T Heaton
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · US

Funding

Surgical and Rehabilitative Management of Facial Nerve InjuryR01NS071067 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI HADLOCK, THERESA A · 2010 to 2020
$4.6M
Surgical Management of Facial Nerve InjuryK08DE015665 · NIDCR · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI HADLOCK, THERESA A · 2005 to 2007
$374k
NIDCR NIH HHS K08 DE015665NIDCR NIH HHS K-08 DE015665-01A2NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS071067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMeasuring rodent facial movements is a reliable method for studying recovery from facial nerve manipulation and for examining the behavioral correlates of aberrant regeneration. The authors quantitatively compared recovery of vibrissal and ocular function following three types of clinically relevant nerve injury.

methodsOne hundred seventy-eight adult rats underwent facial nerve manipulation and testing. In the experimental groups, the left facial nerve was either crushed, transected, and repaired epineurially, or transected and the stumps suture-secured into a tube with a 2-mm gap between them. Facial recovery was measured for the ensuing 1 to 4 months. Data were analyzed for whisking recovery. Previously developed markers of co-contraction of the upper and midfacial zones (possible synkinesis markers) were also examined.

resultsAnimals in the crush groups recovered nearly normal whisking parameters within 25 days. The distal branch crush group showed improved recovery over the main trunk crush group for several days during early recovery. By week 9, the transection/repair groups showed evidence of recovery that trended further upward throughout the study period. The entubulation groups followed a similar recovery pattern, although they did not maintain significant recovery levels by the study conclusion. Markers of potential synkinesis increased in selected groups following facial nerve injury.

conclusionsRodent vibrissal function recovers in a predictable fashion following manipulation. Generalized co-contraction of the upper and midfacial zones emerges following facial nerve manipulation, possibly related to aberrant regeneration, polyterminal axons, or hypersensitivity of the rodent to sensory stimuli following nerve manipulation.

Indexed as

Recovery of FunctionAnimalsBlinkingFacial NerveFacial Nerve InjuriesFemaleModels, AnimalNeural ConductionPeripheral NervesRatsRats, WistarVibrissae

Identifiers

PMID20048604
PMCPMC4394362
OpenAlexW2076682345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.