Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20048233›Full record

ReviewCirculation2010

Cardiovascular networks: systems-based approaches to cardiovascular disease.

Aldons J Lusis, James N Weiss

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Circulation, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Relevance of Multi-Omics Studies in Cardiovascular Diseases.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2019
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. A Network-Biology Informed Computational Drug Repositioning Strategy to Target Disease Risk Trajectories and Comorbidities of Peripheral Artery Disease.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2018
    Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aldons J LusisDepartment of Medicine/Division of Cardiology, BH-307 CHS, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1679, USA. jlusis@mednet.ucla.edu
James N Weiss

Funding

ULTRASTRUCTURE OF THE INTIMA IN EARLY LESION FORMATIONP01HL030568 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI FOGELMAN, ALAN M · 1985 to 2019
$55.2M
Systems genomics of metabolic syndrome traitsP01HL028481 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI REUE, KAREN · 1985 to 2019
$50.2M
WAVE DYNAMICS IN NORMAL AND DISEASED RABBIT HEARTSP01HL078931 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI WEISS, JAMES · 2005 to 2015
$20.7M
Dissection of HDL function using mouse modelsR01HL094322 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI LUSIS, ALDONS JAKE · 2009 to 2013
$1.9M
Metabolic Oscillations in HeartR01HL095663 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI QU, ZHILIN, WEISS, JAMES N · 2009 to 2010
$858k
NHLBI NIH HHS 1P01 HL078931NHLBI NIH HHS 1P01 HL08011NHLBI NIH HHS 1R01 HL095663NHLBI NIH HHS 5P01 HL28481NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL028481NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL030568NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL078931NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL30568NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL094322NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL095663
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Models, CardiovascularModels, GeneticSystems BiologyAnimalsCardiovascular DiseasesHumans

Identifiers

PMID20048233
PMCPMC2836123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.