Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20047672›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2010

A randomised controlled trial and cost-effectiveness evaluation of "booster" interventions to sustain increases in physical activity in middle-aged adults in deprived urban neighbourhoods.

Daniel Hind, Emma J Scott, Robert Copeland, Jeff D Breckon, Helen Crank, Stephen J Walters, John E Brazier, Jon Nicholl, Cindy Cooper, Elizabeth Goyder

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00836459 (A Randomised Controlled Trial and Cost-effectiveness Evaluation of "Booster" Interventions to Sustain Increases in Physical Activity in Middle-aged Adults in Deprived Urban Neighbourhoods.), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00836459 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomised Controlled Trial and Cost-effectiveness Evaluation of "Booster" Interventions to Sustain Increases in Physical Activity in Middle-aged Adults in Deprived Urban Neighbourhoods.

TypeinterventionalSponsorRichard HudsonRan2009 to 2013Enrolled282ConditionsPublic HealthArmsMini Booster, Full Booster
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Effectiveness of booster strategies to promote physical activity maintenance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Face-to-face interventions for promoting physical activity.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Remote and web 2.0 interventions for promoting physical activity.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Daniel HindClinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK.
Emma J Scott
Robert Copeland
Jeff D Breckon
Helen Crank
Stephen J Walters
John E Brazier
Jon Nicholl
Cindy Cooper
Elizabeth Goyder

Funding

Department of Health 07/25/02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSystematic reviews have identified a range of brief interventions which increase physical activity in previously sedentary people. There is an absence of evidence about whether follow up beyond three months can maintain long term physical activity. This study assesses whether it is worth providing motivational interviews, three months after giving initial advice, to those who have become more active. METHODS/

designStudy candidates (n = 1500) will initially be given an interactive DVD and receive two telephone follow ups at monthly intervals checking on receipt and use of the DVD. Only those that have increased their physical activity after three months (n = 600) will be randomised into the study. These participants will receive either a "mini booster" (n = 200), "full booster" (n = 200) or no booster (n = 200). The "mini booster" consists of two telephone calls one month apart to discuss physical activity and maintenance strategies. The "full booster" consists of a face-to-face meeting with the facilitator at the same intervals. The purpose of these booster sessions is to help the individual maintain their increase in physical activity. Differences in physical activity, quality of life and costs associated with the booster interventions, will be measured three and nine months from randomisation. The research will be conducted in 20 of the most deprived neighbourhoods in Sheffield, which have large, ethnically diverse populations, high levels of economic deprivation, low levels of physical activity, poorer health and shorter life expectancy. Participants will be recruited through general practices and community groups, as well as by postal invitation, to ensure the participation of minority ethnic groups and those with lower levels of literacy. Sheffield City Council and Primary Care Trust fund a range of facilities and activities to promote physical activity and variations in access to these between neighbourhoods will make it possible to examine whether the effectiveness of the intervention is modified by access to community facilities. A one-year integrated feasibility study will confirm that recruitment targets are achievable based on a 10% sample. DISCUSSION: The choice of study population, study interventions, brief intervention preceding the study, and outcome measure are discussed.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials: ISRCTN56495859; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00836459.

Indexed as

ExerciseUrban PopulationCost-Benefit AnalysisFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth PromotionHumansLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMotivationProgram EvaluationQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID20047672
PMCPMC2819992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.