ArticleWiener klinische Wochenschrift2009
[Implementation of thrombolysis in acute stroke--10-year results of the Innsbruck stroke registry].
Article in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Challenges in acute stroke].Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRandomized controlled trials have yielded evidence for the efficacy and safety of intravenous alteplase in the therapy of acute ischemic stroke. A large patient registry has recently confirmed the safe implementation of this therapy in the clinical routine setting.
methodsBetween January 1998 and December 2007 302 stroke patients were treated with 0.9 mg/kg rt-PA at the stroke unit of the Innsbruck University Hospital. Severity and circumstances of the stroke event, indicators of pre- and intrahospital management as well as safety and outcome at three months were prospectively assessed in the local thrombolysis database.
resultsThe number of patients receiving intravenous thrombolysis increased continuously from 2 patients in 1998 to 67 in 2007 and 87 patients in 2008. 43% of our patients were females. The median age and NIHSS-score on admission was 67 and 16, respectively. The mean onset-to-needle time decreased from 171 min to 110 min--mainly due to a substantial shortening of the door-to-needle time from 105 min to 45 min. A proportion of 41% of our patients were treated in the main working time while 59% received rt-PA during night and weekend service. A total of 38% of our patients were functionally independent at three months (mRS 0-2). Once considering the high initial stroke severity in our patient series and correcting the NIHSS scores to levels usually seen in randomized control trials and patient registries, 56% of our patients would reach a good outcome (mRS 0-2). The rate of symptomatic intracranial bleedings was low at 6.3%.
conclusionOur data reinforce that intravenous thrombolysis is safe in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke in clinical routine setting. Establishment of modern stroke services and the implementation of structural operating procedures have contributed to an increase in the number of treated patients and a parallel decrease in door-to-needle time at our hospital. Widespread educational programs in the general community, introduction of optimized pre-hospital triage algorithms as well as the potential extension of the 3-hour window to 4.5 hours all are suitable measures to further extend the benefit of i.v. thrombolysis to large proportion of stroke patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.