Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20046654›Full record

Trial reportJournal of diabetes science and technology2009

Clinical evaluation of a transcutaneous interrogated fluorescence lifetime-based microsensor for continuous glucose reading.

Jannik K Nielsen, Jens S Christiansen, Jesper S Kristensen, Hans O Toft, Lars Lundby Hansen, Søren Aasmul, Klaus Gregorius

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jannik K NielsenDepartment of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus C, Denmark. j.k.n@dadlnet.dk
Jens S Christiansen
Jesper S Kristensen
Hans O Toft
Lars Lundby Hansen
Søren Aasmul
Klaus Gregorius

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContinuous glucose monitoring is presently used worldwide. Accuracy, precision, durability, invasiveness, and lack of drift of sensors and lag time are key parameters essential to these systems. This article describes a new online minimally invasive biodegradable microsensor for optical, transcutaneous interrogation, which has at least 14 days of functionality.

methodStudies were performed in vitro and in vivo on pigs, as well as on type 1 diabetic humans. Functionality has been ensured in laboratory settings, and precision and durability have been tested in vivo. During in vivo studies, venous blood samples were used as reference. Results were based on one single point calibration per experiment.

resultsExcellent stability was found in 14-day in vitro trials as well as in vivo in up to 70-hour trials. The overall median relative absolute difference of type 1 diabetic patients was 11.4%. Error grid analysis showed 97.7% of all values in the A+B zone. Comparable results were found in animal studies. No sensor drift was observed in any trial.

conclusionResults point toward the possibility of developing a stable and precise minimally invasive glucose reader for at least 2 weeks of continuous use.

Indexed as

AdultAnimalsBiosensing TechniquesBlood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, AmbulatorySwineBlood Glucoseaccuracycontinuous glucose monitoringfluorescencelifetimevariability

Identifiers

PMID20046654
PMCPMC2769858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.