Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20046321›Full record

ArticlePaediatrics & child health2002

Controversies in the management of bacterial meningitis.

Trenna Sutcliffe

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Paediatrics & child health, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 98% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Trenna SutcliffeDepartment of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.
Hospital for Sick Children · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial meningitis is an important infection of childhood with significant morbidity and mortality, and clinicians are faced with controversies over steroid use and fluid restriction in its initial management because the standard of practice is not clear. A 1999 survey of paediatric infectious diseases specialists demonstrated that only 56% of respondents recommended dexamethasone for Haemophilus influenzae type b meningitis and only 34% recommended dexamethasone for Streptococcus pneumoniae meningitis, despite recommendations for dexamethasone in the 1997 Red Book. The present article illustrates a typical case presentation of bacterial meningitis, and discusses dexamethasone use and fluid restriction. The use of intravenous fluid therapy is also reviewed, based on results from the single prospective randomized clinical trial in this area.

Indexed as

Bacterial meningitisDexamethasoneFluid managementMeningitis

Identifiers

PMID20046321
PMCPMC2795673
OpenAlexW195813805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.