ReviewPharmacological research2010
Enabling individualized therapy through nanotechnology.
Review in Pharmacological research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 226 citations in OpenAlex.
- BBB-aware stimuli-responsive and biomimetic nanomedicines for glioblastoma.Chinese neurosurgical journal · 2026Review
- Recent advancements in nanoparticles for cancer treatment.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- Development and Characterization of Lyophilized Chondroitin Sulfate-Loaded Solid Lipid Nanoparticles: Encapsulation Efficiency and Stability.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Biological Synthesis of Metallic Nanoparticles: Latest Insights and Applications.Pharmaceutical nanotechnology · 2025Review
- Cellular and molecular aspects of drug resistance in cancers.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2024Review
- Review
- CRISPR-Based Therapies: Revolutionizing Drug Development and Precision Medicine.Current gene therapy · 2024Review
- Recent progress in the development of nanomaterials targeting multiple cancer metabolic pathways: a review of mechanistic approaches for cancer treatment.Drug delivery · 2023Review
- Effect of Nanoparticle Weight on the Cellular Uptake and Drug Delivery Potential of PLGA Nanoparticles.ACS omega · 2023Article
- Antioxidant Efficacy of Green-Synthesized Silver Nanoparticles Promotes Wound Healing in Mice.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- Response of the Endogenous Antioxidant Defense System Induced in RAW 264.7 Macrophages upon Exposure to Dextran-Coated Iron Oxide Nanoparticles.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- Evaluating nanobiomaterial-induced DNA strand breaks using the alkaline comet assay.Drug delivery and translational research · 2022Article
- Nanocarriers for Drug Delivery: An Overview with Emphasis on Vitamin D and K Transportation.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Repurposing ferumoxytol: Diagnostic and therapeutic applications of an FDA-approved nanoparticle.Theranostics · 2022Review
- Application of Nanotechnology for Sensitive Detection of Low-Abundance Single-Nucleotide Variations in Genomic DNA: A Review.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Nanovectorization of Prostate Cancer Treatment Strategies: A New Approach to Improved Outcomes.Pharmaceutics · 2021Review
- Liposome-Embedding Silicon Microparticle for Oxaliplatin Delivery in Tumor Chemotherapy.Pharmaceutics · 2020Article
- DNA Microsystems for Biodiagnosis.Micromachines · 2020Review
- Recent strategies towards the surface modification of liposomes: an innovative approach for different clinical applications.3 Biotech · 2020Review
- Modeling a pH-sensitive Zein-3 Biotech · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Individualized medicine is the healthcare strategy that rebukes the idiomatic dogma of 'losing sight of the forest for the trees'. We are entering a new era of healthcare where it is no longer acceptable to develop and market a drug that is effective for only 80% of the patient population. The emergence of "-omic" technologies (e.g. genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics) and advances in systems biology are magnifying the deficiencies of standardized therapy, which often provide little treatment latitude for accommodating patient physiologic idiosyncrasies. A personalized approach to medicine is not a novel concept. Ever since the scientific community began unraveling the mysteries of the genome, the promise of discarding generic treatment regimens in favor of patient-specific therapies became more feasible and realistic. One of the major scientific impediments of this movement towards personalized medicine has been the need for technological enablement. Nanotechnology is projected to play a critical role in patient-specific therapy; however, this transition will depend heavily upon the evolutionary development of a systems biology approach to clinical medicine based upon "-omic" technology analysis and integration. This manuscript provides a forward looking assessment of the promise of nanomedicine as it pertains to individualized medicine and establishes a technology "snapshot" of the current state of nano-based products over a vast array of clinical indications and range of patient specificity. Other issues such as market driven hurdles and regulatory compliance reform are anticipated to "self-correct" in accordance to scientific advancement and healthcare demand. These peripheral, non-scientific concerns are not addressed at length in this manuscript; however they do exist, and their impact to the paradigm shifting healthcare transformation towards individualized medicine will be critical for its success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.