Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20044577›Full record

ArticleScience (New York, N.Y.)2010

The rate and molecular spectrum of spontaneous mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Stephan Ossowski, Korbinian Schneeberger, José Ignacio Lucas-Lledó, Norman Warthmann, Richard M Clark, Ruth G Shaw, Detlef Weigel, Michael Lynch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 593 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
593citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

593 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Genomic history and ecology of local adaptation in sky-islandbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Genome degradation in plant tissue culture.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

533 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stephan OssowskiDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Korbinian Schneeberger
José Ignacio Lucas-Lledó
Norman Warthmann
Richard M Clark
Ruth G Shaw
Detlef Weigel
Michael Lynch

Funding

The Rate and Molecular Spectrum of Spontaneous MutationsR01GM036827 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI LYNCH, MICHAEL R · 1988 to 2016
$5.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM36827NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM036827
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To take complete advantage of information on within-species polymorphism and divergence from close relatives, one needs to know the rate and the molecular spectrum of spontaneous mutations. To this end, we have searched for de novo spontaneous mutations in the complete nuclear genomes of five Arabidopsis thaliana mutation accumulation lines that had been maintained by single-seed descent for 30 generations. We identified and validated 99 base substitutions and 17 small and large insertions and deletions. Our results imply a spontaneous mutation rate of 7 x 10(-9) base substitutions per site per generation, the majority of which are G:C-->A:T transitions. We explain this very biased spectrum of base substitution mutations as a result of two main processes: deamination of methylated cytosines and ultraviolet light-induced mutagenesis.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantMutationArabidopsisCytosineDeaminationDNA, IntergenicDNA MethylationDNA, PlantINDEL MutationSequence Analysis, DNASequence DeletionUltraviolet RaysCytosineDNA, IntergenicDNA, Plant

Identifiers

PMID20044577
PMCPMC3878865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.