Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20044059›Full record

ArticleVaccine2010

Identification of immunodominant antigens of Chlamydia trachomatis using proteome microarrays.

Douglas M Molina, Sukumar Pal, Mathew A Kayala, Andy Teng, Paul J Kim, Pierre Baldi, Philip L Felgner, Xiaowu Liang, Luis M de la Maza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Update on Chlamydia trachomatis Vaccinology.Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI · 2017
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Approach to discover T- and B-cell antigens of intracellular pathogens applied to the design of Chlamydia trachomatis vaccines.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Protein microarrays for systems biology.Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2011
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Douglas M MolinaImmPORT Therapeutics, 1 Technology Drive, Suite E309, Irvine, CA 92618, USA.
Sukumar Pal
Mathew A Kayala
Andy Teng
Paul J Kim
Pierre Baldi
Philip L Felgner
Xiaowu Liang
Luis M de la Maza
University of California, Irvine · US

Funding

Univ.of Calif., Irvine Cancer Center Support GrantP30CA062203 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI Christine Hui · 1994 to 2026
$57.9M
Recombinant C. trachomatis vaccineR01AI067888 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI DE LA MAZA, LUIS M · 2007 to 2011
$1.9M
Scanning Chlamydia proteome for vaccine antigensR42AI072847 · NIAID · IMMPORT THERAPEUTICS, INC. · PI DE LA MAZA, LUIS M · 2009 to 2010
$1.8M
Scanning Chlamydia proteome for vaccine antigensR41AI072847 · NIAID · IMMPORT THERAPEUTICS, INC. · PI DE LA MAZA, LUIS M · 2007 to 2008
$599k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA062203NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI067888NIAID NIH HHS R41 AI072847NIAID NIH HHS R42 AI072847
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chlamydia trachomatis is the most common bacterial sexually transmitted pathogen in the world. In order to control this infection there is an urgent need to formulate a vaccine. Identification of protective antigens is required to implement a subunit vaccine. To identify potential antigen vaccine candidates, three strains of mice, BALB/c, C3H/HeN and C57BL/6, were inoculated with live and inactivated C. trachomatis mouse pneumonitis (MoPn) by different routes of immunization. Using a protein microarray, serum samples collected after immunization were tested for the presence of antibodies against specific chlamydial antigens. A total of 225 open reading frames (ORF) of the C. trachomatis genome were cloned, expressed, and printed in the microarray. Using this protein microarray, a total of seven C. trachomatis dominant antigens were identified (TC0052, TC0189, TC0582, TC0660, TC0726, TC0816 and, TC0828) as recognized by IgG antibodies from all three strains of animals after immunization. In addition, the microarray was probed to determine if the antibody response exhibited a Th1 or Th2 bias. Animals immunized with live organisms mounted a predominant Th1 response against most of the chlamydial antigens while mice immunized with inactivated Chlamydia mounted a Th2-biased response. In conclusion, using a high throughput protein microarray we have identified a set of novel proteins that can be tested for their ability to protect against a chlamydial infection.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialBacterial ProteinsChlamydia trachomatisFemaleImmunodominant EpitopesImmunoglobulin GMaleMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C3HMice, Inbred C57BLProtein Array AnalysisTh1 CellsTh2 CellsAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialBacterial ProteinsImmunodominant EpitopesImmunoglobulin G

Identifiers

PMID20044059
PMCPMC3048468
OpenAlexW2132433679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.