Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20043029›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Drug discovery2010

Key factors in the discovery and development of new antiepileptic drugs.

Meir Bialer, H Steve White

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 173 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
173citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

173 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Adenosine ANeuropharmacology · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Investigation of Anticonvulsant Potential ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Isoindoline-1,3-dione Derivatives as Prototypes for Anticonvulsant Drug Discovery.Medicinal chemistry (Shariqah (United Arab Emirates)) · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

113 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Meir BialerInstitute of Drug Research, School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, and the David R. Bloom Centre for Pharmacy, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel. bialer@md.huji.ac.il
H Steve White

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the early 1990s, many new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) that offer appreciable advantages in terms of their favourable pharmacokinetics, improved tolerability and lower potential for drug-drug interactions have entered the market. However, despite the therapeutic arsenal of old and new AEDs, approximately 30% of patients with epilepsy still suffer from seizures. Thus, there remains a substantial need for the development of more efficacious AEDs for patients with refractory seizures. Here, we briefly review the emerging knowledge on the pathological basis of epilepsy and how it might best be used in the design of new therapeutics. We also discuss the current approach to AED discovery and highlight some of the unique features of newer models of pharmacoresistance and epileptogenesis that have emerged in recent years.

Indexed as

Drug DesignAnimalsAnticonvulsantsDisease Models, AnimalDrug DiscoveryDrug InteractionsDrug ResistanceEpilepsyHumansAnticonvulsants

Identifiers

PMID20043029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.