Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20042848›Full record

ArticleAIDS (London, England)2010

Male circumcision and risk of male-to-female HIV-1 transmission: a multinational prospective study in African HIV-1-serodiscordant couples.

Jared M Baeten, Deborah Donnell, Saidi H Kapiga, Allan Ronald, Grace John-Stewart, Mubiana Inambao, Rachel Manongi, Bellington Vwalika, Connie Celum, Partners in Prevention HSV/HIV Transmission Study Team

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS (London, England), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Impact of Male Partner Circumcision on Women's Health Outcomes.AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Canadian Urological Association guideline on the care of the normal foreskin and neonatal circumcision in Canadian infants (full version).Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Jared M BaetenUniversity of Washington, WA, USA. jbaeten@u.washington.edu
Deborah Donnell
Saidi H Kapiga
Allan Ronald
Grace John-Stewart
Mubiana Inambao
Rachel Manongi
Bellington Vwalika
Connie Celum
Partners in Prevention HSV/HIV Transmission Study Team
University of Washington · USKilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre · TZRwanda Zambia HIV Research Group · RWFred Hutch Cancer Center · USUniversity of Manitoba · CA

Funding

University of Washington/Fred Hutch Center for AIDS ResearchP30AI027757 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Grace C. John-Stewart · 1988 to 2026
$104.9M
Multi-component, Targeted HIV Prevention for sub-Saharan Africa: PreventionRxR01AI083034 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CELUM, CONNIE L · 2009 to 2012
$4.3M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027757NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI083034PHS HHS R01 083034PHS HHS R01 66767
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMale circumcision reduces female-to-male HIV-1 transmission risk by approximately 60%. Data assessing the effect of circumcision on male-to-female HIV-1 transmission are conflicting, with one observational study among HIV-1-serodiscordant couples showing reduced transmission but a randomized trial suggesting no short-term benefit of circumcision. DESIGN/

methodsData collected as part of a prospective study among African HIV-1-serodiscordant couples were analyzed for the relationship between circumcision status of HIV-1-seropositive men and risk of HIV-1 acquisition among their female partners. Circumcision status was determined by physical examination. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used.

resultsA total of 1096 HIV-1-serodiscordant couples in which the male partner was HIV-1-infected were followed for a median of 18 months; 374 (34%) male partners were circumcised. Sixty-four female partners seroconverted to HIV-1 (incidence 3.8 per 100 person-years). Circumcision of the male partner was associated with a nonstatistically significant approximately 40% lower risk of HIV-1 acquisition by the female partner (hazard ratio 0.62, 95% confidence interval 0.35-1.10, P = 0.10). The magnitude of this effect was similar when restricted to the subset of HIV-1 transmission events confirmed by viral sequencing to have occurred within the partnership (n = 50, hazard ratio 0.57, P = 0.11), after adjustment for male partner plasma HIV-1 concentrations (hazard ratio 0.60, P = 0.13), and when excluding follow-up time for male partners who initiated antiretroviral therapy (hazard ratio 0.53, P = 0.07).

conclusionAmong HIV-1-serodiscordant couples in which the HIV-1-seropositive partner was male, we observed no increased risk and potentially decreased risk from circumcision on male-to-female transmission of HIV-1.

Indexed as

HIV-1HIV-2HIV SeronegativityAdultBlack PeopleCircumcision, MaleFemaleHeterosexualityHIV InfectionsHumansMaleProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSexual Behavior

Identifiers

PMID20042848
PMCPMC2919808
OpenAlexW2107473128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.