Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20042500›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2010

Interaction domains of the UL16 and UL21 tegument proteins of herpes simplex virus.

Amy L Harper, David G Meckes, Jacob A Marsh, Michael D Ward, Pei-Chun Yeh, Nicholas L Baird, Carol B Wilson, O John Semmes, John W Wills

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Nuclear Egress.Current issues in molecular biology · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. HSV-1 Cytoplasmic Envelopment and Egress.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amy L HarperDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.
David G Meckes
Jacob A Marsh
Michael D Ward
Pei-Chun Yeh
Nicholas L Baird
Carol B Wilson
O John Semmes
John W Wills
Pennsylvania State University · USEastern Virginia Medical School · US

Funding

Molecular Functions and Mechanisms of UL16, A Conserved Tegument Protein of HSVR01AI071286 · NIAID · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI WILLS, JOHN W. · 2007 to 2016
$5.1M
VIRUSES AND CANCERT32CA060395 · NCI · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI MEYERS, CRAIG M · 1994 to 2021
$4.3M
HTLV-I TAX MEDIATED DEREGULATION OF CELL STATER01CA076595 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI SEMMES, OLIVER JOHN · 1999 to 2016
$2.9M
Text Messaging to Improve Adherence to Oral Chemotherapy AgentsR15CA176595 · NCI · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SPOELSTRA, SANDRA LEE · 2013 to 2013
$465k
NCI NIH HHS CA0176595NCI NIH HHS CA60395NCI NIH HHS R01 CA076595NCI NIH HHS R15 CA176595NCI NIH HHS T32 CA060395NIAID NIH HHS AI071286NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI071286
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The UL16 protein of herpes simplex virus is capsid associated and was previously identified as a binding partner of the membrane-associated UL11 tegument protein (J. S. Loomis, R. J. Courtney, and J. W. Wills, J. Virol. 77:11417-11424, 2003). In those studies, a less-prominent, approximately 65-kDa binding partner of unknown identity was also observed. Mass spectrometry studies have now revealed this species to be UL21, a tegument protein that has been implicated in the transport of capsids in the cytoplasm. The validity of the mass spectrometry results was tested in a variety of coimmunoprecipitation and glutathione S-transferase pull-down experiments. The data revealed that UL21 and UL16 can form a complex in the absence of other viral proteins, even when the assays used proteins purified from Escherichia coli. Moreover, UL11 was able to pull down UL21 only when UL16 was present, suggesting that all three proteins can form a complex. Deletion analyses revealed that the second half of UL21 (residues 268 to 535) is sufficient for the UL16 interaction and packaging into virions; however, attempts to map a subdomain of UL16 were largely unsuccessful, with only the first 40 (of 373) residues being found to be dispensable. Nevertheless, it is clear that UL16 must have two distinct binding sites, because covalent modification of its free cysteines with N-ethylmaleimide blocked binding to UL11 but not UL21. These findings should prove useful for elucidating the molecular machinery used to transmit a signal into a virion when it attaches to cells, a recently discovered mechanism in which UL16 is a central player.

Indexed as

AnimalsCapsidChlorocebus aethiopsHumansMass SpectrometryMultiprotein ComplexesProtein BindingProtein Structure, TertiaryRecombinant Fusion ProteinsSimplexvirusVero CellsViral ProteinsViral Structural ProteinsVirionMultiprotein ComplexesRecombinant Fusion ProteinsUL21 protein, herpes simplex virus 1Viral ProteinsViral Structural Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20042500
PMCPMC2826038
OpenAlexW2136527442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.