Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20041824›Full record

ReviewCurrent pharmaceutical design2010

Echinoderms: potential model systems for studies on muscle regeneration.

José E García-Arrarás, Igor Yu Dolmatov

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current pharmaceutical design, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Expression ofGenes · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Role of the Microbiota in Regeneration-Associated Processes.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  20. A roadmap for intestinal regeneration.The International journal of developmental biology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

José E García-ArrarásBiology Department, University of Puerto Rico, Rio Piedras Campus, Puerto Rico. jegarcia@hpcf.upr.edu
Igor Yu Dolmatov
University of Puerto Rico at Río Piedras · PR

Funding

Molecular control of intestinal regenerationSC1GM084770 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO RIO PIEDRAS · PI GARCIA-ARRARAS, JOSE E · 2008 to 2011
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS 1SC1GM084770-01NIGMS NIH HHS SC1 GM084770
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organisms of the phylum Echinodermata show some of the most impressive regenerative feats within the animal kingdom. Following injury or self-induced autotomy, species in this phylum can regenerate most tissues and organs, being the regeneration of the muscular systems one of the best studied. Even though echinoderms are closely related to chordates, they are little known in the biomedical field, and therefore their uses to study pharmacological effects on muscle formation and/or regeneration have been extremely limited. In order to rectify this lack of knowledge, we describe here the echinoderm muscular systems, particularly the somatic and visceral muscle components. In addition, we provide details of the processes that are known to take place during muscle regeneration, namely dedifferentiation, myogenesis and new muscle formation. Finally, we provide the available information on molecular and pharmacological studies that involve echinoderm muscle regeneration. We expect that by making this information accessible, researchers consider the use of echinoderms as model systems for pharmacological studies in muscle development and regeneration.

Indexed as

Models, AnimalAnimalsCell DedifferentiationEchinodermataEndocrine DisruptorsModels, BiologicalMusclesRegenerationEndocrine Disruptors

Identifiers

PMID20041824
PMCPMC2933377
OpenAlexW2151132641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.