ArticleBiological cybernetics1991
Speech recognition by an artificial neural network using findings on the afferent auditory system.
Article in Biological cybernetics, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A global view on how local muscular fatigue affects human performance.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- A neural network application to classification of health status of HIV/AIDS patients.Journal of medical systems · 1997Article
- Noninvasive diagnosis of coronary artery disease using a neural network algorithm.Biological cybernetics · 1992Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An artificial neural network which uses anatomical and physiological findings on the afferent pathway from the ear to the cortex is presented and the roles of the constituent functions in recognition of continuous speech are examined. The network deals with successive spectra of speech sounds by a cascade of several neural layers: lateral excitation layer (LEL), lateral inhibition layer (LIL), and a pile of feature detection layers (FDL's). These layers are shown to be effective for recognizing spoken words. Namely, first, LEL reduces the distortion of sound spectrum caused by the pitch of speech sounds. Next, LIL emphasizes the major energy peaks of sound spectrum, the formants. Last, FDL's detect syllables and words in successive formants, where two functions, time-delay and strong adaptation, play important roles: time-delay makes it possible to retain the pattern of formant changes for a period to detect spoken words successively; strong adaptation contributes to removing the time-warp of formant changes. Digital computer simulations show that the network detect isolated syllables, isolated words, and connected words in continuous speech, while reproducing the fundamental responses found in the auditory system such as ON, OFF, ON-OFF, and SUSTAINED patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
2004135What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.