Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20041203›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2009

Feedback inhibition in the PhoQ/PhoP signaling system by a membrane peptide.

Andrew M Lippa, Mark Goulian

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 142 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
142citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

142 citing papers in PubMed, 246 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genomic epidemiology ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Analysis of stress-induced small proteins inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Gene age and genome organization inFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Large Roles of Small Proteins.Annual review of microbiology · 2024
    Review

82 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew M LippaCell and Molecular Biology Graduate Group, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Mark Goulian
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Regulation of Bacterial Two-Component Signaling by Small Membrane ProteinsR01GM080279 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GOULIAN, MARK D · 2007 to 2020
$3.7M
Training in bacteriologyT32AI060516 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GOULIAN, MARK D, ZHU, JUN · 2006 to 2015
$2.0M
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI060516NIGMS NIH HHS GM080279NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM080279
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The PhoQ/PhoP signaling system responds to low magnesium and the presence of certain cationic antimicrobial peptides. It regulates genes important for growth under these conditions, as well as additional genes important for virulence in many gram-negative pathogens. PhoQ is a sensor kinase that phosphorylates and activates the transcription factor PhoP. Since feedback inhibition is a common theme in stress-response circuits, we hypothesized that some members of the PhoP regulon may play such a role in the PhoQ/PhoP pathway. We therefore screened for PhoP-regulated genes that mediate feedback in this system. We found that deletion of mgrB (yobG), which encodes a 47 amino acid peptide, results in a potent increase in PhoP-regulated transcription. In addition, over-expression of mgrB decreased transcription at both high and low concentrations of magnesium. Localization and bacterial two-hybrid studies suggest that MgrB resides in the inner-membrane and interacts directly with PhoQ. We further show that MgrB homologs from Salmonella typhimurium and Yersinia pestis also repress PhoP-regulated transcription in these organisms. In cell regulatory circuits, feedback has been associated with modulating the induction kinetics and/or the cell-to-cell variability in response to stimulus. Interestingly, we found that elimination of MgrB-mediated feedback did not have a significant effect on the kinetics of reporter protein production and did not decrease the variability in expression among cells. Our results indicate MgrB is a broadly conserved membrane peptide that is a critical mediator of negative feedback in the PhoQ/PhoP circuit. This new regulator may function as a point of control that integrates additional input signals to modulate the activity of this important signaling system.

Indexed as

Feedback, PhysiologicalSignal TransductionAmino Acid SequenceBacterial ProteinsBase SequenceCell MembraneChromosome DeletionEscherichia coliGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGenetic Complementation TestModels, BiologicalMolecular Sequence DataPeptidesPlasmidsProtein BindingProtein Structure, TertiaryBacterial ProteinsPeptidesPhoP protein, BacteriaPhoQ protein, Bacteria

Identifiers

PMID20041203
PMCPMC2789325
OpenAlexW2075026718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.