ArticlePloS one2009
Reverse evolution: driving forces behind the loss of acquired photosynthetic traits.
Article in PloS one, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global distribution, diversity, and ecological niche of Picozoa, a widespread and enigmatic marine protist lineage.Microbiome · 2024Article
- Modeling the metabolic evolution of mixotrophic phytoplankton in response to rising ocean surface temperatures.BMC ecology and evolution · 2022Article
- Impact of Genome Reduction in Microsporidia.Experientia supplementum (2012) · 2022Article
- Nutrient-driven genome evolution revealed by comparative genomics of chrysomonad flagellates.Communications biology · 2021Article
- Intraspecific Variation in Protists: Clues for Microevolution from Poteriospumella lacustris (Chrysophyceae).Genome biology and evolution · 2019Article
- Principles of plastid reductive evolution illuminated by nonphotosynthetic chrysophytes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019Article
- Evolution of heterotrophy in chrysophytes as reflected by comparative transcriptomics.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2018Article
- Effect of light and prey availability on gene expression of the mixotrophic chrysophyte, Ochromonas sp.BMC genomics · 2017Article
- Small but Manifold - Hidden Diversity in "Spumella-like Flagellates".The Journal of eukaryotic microbiology · 2016Article
- When the lights go out: the evolutionary fate of free-living colorless green algae.The New phytologist · 2015Review
- Maximum in the middle: nonlinear response of microbial plankton to ultraviolet radiation and phosphorus.PloS one · 2013Article
- Capturing diversity of marine heterotrophic protists: one cell at a time.The ISME journal · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe loss of photosynthesis has occurred often in eukaryotic evolution, even more than its acquisition, which occurred at least nine times independently and which generated the evolution of the supergroups Archaeplastida, Rhizaria, Chromalveolata and Excavata. This secondary loss of autotrophic capability is essential to explain the evolution of eukaryotes and the high diversity of protists, which has been severely underestimated until recently. However, the ecological and evolutionary scenarios behind this evolutionary "step back" are still largely unknown. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsUsing a dynamic model of heterotrophic and mixotrophic flagellates and two types of prey, large bacteria and ultramicrobacteria, we examine the influence of DOC concentration, mixotroph's photosynthetic growth rate, and external limitations of photosynthesis on the coexistence of both types of flagellates. Our key premises are: large bacteria grow faster than small ones at high DOC concentrations, and vice versa; and heterotrophic flagellates are more efficient than the mixotrophs grazing small bacteria (both empirically supported). We show that differential efficiency in bacteria grazing, which strongly depends on cell size, is a key factor to explain the loss of photosynthesis in mixotrophs (which combine photosynthesis and bacterivory) leading to purely heterotrophic lineages. Further, we show in what conditions an heterotroph mutant can coexist, or even out-compete, its mixotrophic ancestor, suggesting that bacterivory and cell size reduction may have been major triggers for the diversification of eukaryotes. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our results suggest that, provided the mixotroph's photosynthetic advantage is not too large, the (small) heterotroph will also dominate in nutrient-poor environments and will readily invade a community of mixotrophs and bacteria, due to its higher efficiency exploiting the ultramicrobacteria. As carbon-limited conditions were presumably widespread throughout Earth history, such a scenario may explain the numerous transitions from phototrophy to mixotrophy and further to heterotrophy within virtually all major algal lineages. We challenge prevailing concepts that affiliated the evolution of phagotrophy with eutrophic or strongly light-limited environments only.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.