Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20041107›Full record

ArticlePloS one2009

The evolutionary history of protein domains viewed by species phylogeny.

Song Yang, Philip E Bourne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. In Silico Analysis of Fatty Acid Desaturases Structures inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Classification and function of small open reading frames.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Resurrecting the Dead (Molecules).Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Song YangSkaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Philip E Bourne

Funding

Protein Functional Site Characterization and AnalysisR01GM078596 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BOURNE, PHILIP E · 2007 to 2010
$2.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM 078596NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078596
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProtein structural domains are evolutionary units whose relationships can be detected over long evolutionary distances. The evolutionary history of protein domains, including the origin of protein domains, the identification of domain loss, transfer, duplication and combination with other domains to form new proteins, and the formation of the entire protein domain repertoire, are of great interest. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsA methodology is presented for providing a parsimonious domain history based on gain, loss, vertical and horizontal transfer derived from the complete genomic domain assignments of 1015 organisms across the tree of life. When mapped to species trees the evolutionary history of domains and domain combinations is revealed, and the general evolutionary trend of domain and combination is analyzed. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We show that this approach provides a powerful tool to study how new proteins and functions emerged and to study such processes as horizontal gene transfer among more distant species.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularPhylogenyProtein Structure, TertiaryDatabases, ProteinPhycobilisomesPhycocyaninReproducibility of ResultsSpecies SpecificityPhycobilisomesPhycocyanin

Identifiers

PMID20041107
PMCPMC2794708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.