Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20040917›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2010

Model or meal? Farm animal populations as models for infectious diseases of humans.

Cristina Lanzas, Patrick Ayscue, Renata Ivanek, Yrjö T Gröhn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Effects of Dietary Chlorogenic Acid Supplementation Derived fromOxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. The contribution of bovines to human health against viral infections.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Effectiveness analysis of resistance and tolerance to infection.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cristina LanzasDepartment of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA. cl272@cornell.edu
Patrick Ayscue
Renata Ivanek
Yrjö T Gröhn

Funding

FOOD &WATERBORNE DISEASES INTEGRATED RESEARCH NETWORK, ZOONOES RESEAR-N01AI030054 · NIAID · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · 2003 to 2003
–
NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI030054NIAID NIH HHS N01-AI-30054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent decades, theory addressing the processes that underlie the dynamics of infectious diseases has progressed considerably. Unfortunately, the availability of empirical data to evaluate these theories has not grown at the same pace. Although laboratory animals have been widely used as models at the organism level, they have been less appropriate for addressing issues at the population level. However, farm animal populations can provide empirical models to study infectious diseases at the population level.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalHost-Pathogen InteractionsAnimalsAnimals, DomesticCommunicable DiseasesHumansModels, BiologicalPopulation

Identifiers

PMID20040917
PMCPMC7097165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.