Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20040088›Full record

Trial reportBMC pulmonary medicine2009

Action Plan to enhance self-management and early detection of exacerbations in COPD patients; a multicenter RCT.

Jaap C A Trappenburg, Lieselotte Koevoets, Gerdien H de Weert-van Oene, Evelyn M Monninkhof, Jean Bourbeau, Thierry Troosters, Theo J M Verheij, Jan-Willem J Lammers, Augustinus J P Schrijvers

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04459546 (The Effect of Rational Drug Use and Symptom Control Training on Self-efficacy, Emotional Status and Clinical Parameters in COPD), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04459546 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Rational Drug Use and Symptom Control Training on Self-efficacy, Emotional Status and Clinical Parameters in COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)

TypeinterventionalSponsorPamukkale UniversityRan2018 to 2019Enrolled41ConditionsCOPD, COPD ExacerbationArmspatient education, training booklet, 3 months tele health
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Efficacy of a self-management plan in exacerbations for patients with advanced COPD.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2016
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Recent advances in the management of breathlessness.Indian journal of palliative care · 2011
    Article
  14. Detecting exacerbations using the Clinical COPD Questionnaire.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jaap C A TrappenburgJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands. j.c.a.trappenburg@umcutrecht.nl
Lieselotte Koevoets
Gerdien H de Weert-van Oene
Evelyn M Monninkhof
Jean Bourbeau
Thierry Troosters
Theo J M Verheij
Jan-Willem J Lammers
Augustinus J P Schrijvers

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly detection of exacerbations by COPD patients initiating prompt interventions has shown to be clinically relevant. Until now, research failed to identify the effectiveness of a written individualized Action Plan (AP) to achieve this. METHODS/

designThe current multicenter, single-blind RCT with a follow-up period of 6 months, evaluates the hypothesis that individualized AP's reduce exacerbation recovery time. Patients are included from regular respiratory nurse clinics and allocated to either usual care or the AP intervention. The AP provides individualized treatment prescriptions (pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical) related to a color coded symptom status (reinforcement at 1 and 4 months). Although usually not possible in self-management trials, we ensured blinding of patients, using a modified informed consent procedure in which patients give consent to postponed information. Exacerbations in both study arms are defined using the Anthonisen symptom diary-card algorithm. The Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) is assessed every 3-days. CCQ-recovery time of an exacerbation is the primary study outcome. Additionally, healthcare utilization, anxiety, depression, treatment delay, and self-efficacy are assessed at baseline and 6 months. We aim at including 245 COPD patients from 7 hospitals and 5 general practices to capture the a-priori sample size of at least 73 exacerbations per study arm. DISCUSSION: This RCT identifies if an AP is an effective component of self-management in patients with COPD and clearly differentiates from existing studies in its design, outcome measures and generalizability of the results considering that the study is carried out in multiple sites including general practices.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsAnxietyDepressionFollow-Up StudiesHeart DiseasesHumansMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveQuality of LifeSelf CareSingle-Blind Method

Identifiers

PMID20040088
PMCPMC2805602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.