Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20039786›Full record

ReviewCritical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology2010

DNA interstrand crosslink repair in mammalian cells: step by step.

Parameswary A Muniandy, Jia Liu, Alokes Majumdar, Su-ting Liu, Michael M Seidman

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed, 180 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Stable Interstrand Cross-Links Generated from the Repair of 1,Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. DNA Alkylation Damage by Nitrosamines and Relevant DNA Repair Pathways.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Role of DNA Repair in Genomic Instability of Multiple Myeloma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. (5'International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Fanconi anemia-independent DNA inter-strand crosslink repair in eukaryotes.Progress in biophysics and molecular biology · 2020
    Review

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Parameswary A MuniandyLaboratory of Molecular Gerontology, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.
Jia Liu
Alokes Majumdar
Su-ting Liu
Michael M Seidman
National Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Repair of localized DNA damageZIAAG000746 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI SEIDMAN, MICHAEL · 2009 to 2025
$30.0M
Repair of localized DNA damageZ01AG000746 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI SEIDMAN, MICHAEL · 2007 to 2008
$607k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 AG000746NIA NIH HHS AG000746-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interstrand DNA crosslinks (ICLs) are formed by natural products of metabolism and by chemotherapeutic reagents. Work in E. coli identified a two cycle repair scheme involving incisions on one strand on either side of the ICL (unhooking) producing a gapped intermediate with the incised oligonucleotide attached to the intact strand. The gap is filled by recombinational repair or lesion bypass synthesis. The remaining monoadduct is then removed by nucleotide excision repair (NER). Despite considerable effort, our understanding of each step in mammalian cells is still quite limited. In part this reflects the variety of crosslinking compounds, each with distinct structural features, used by different investigators. Also, multiple repair pathways are involved, variably operative during the cell cycle. G(1) phase repair requires functions from NER, although the mechanism of recognition has not been determined. Repair can be initiated by encounters with the transcriptional apparatus, or a replication fork. In the case of the latter, the reconstruction of a replication fork, stalled or broken by collision with an ICL, adds to the complexity of the repair process. The enzymology of unhooking, the identity of the lesion bypass polymerases required to fill the first repair gap, and the functions involved in the second repair cycle are all subjects of active inquiry. Here we will review current understanding of each step in ICL repair in mammalian cells.

Indexed as

DNA DamageDNA RepairAnimalsCell CycleCross-Linking ReagentsDNAFanconi AnemiaHumansRecombination, GeneticCross-Linking ReagentsDNA

Identifiers

PMID20039786
PMCPMC2824768
OpenAlexW1971777367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.