Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20039462›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2010

A dynamic model of once-daily 5-aminosalicylic acid predicts clinical efficacy.

Deepak Parakkal, Eli D Ehrenpreis, Matthew P Thorpe, Karson S Putt, Bruce Hannon

Open access · greenAbstract readCommentLetter
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Deepak Parakkal
Eli D Ehrenpreis
Matthew P Thorpe
Karson S Putt
Bruce Hannon
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USNorthwell Health · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New once daily mesalamine formulations may improve adherence to medication usage. Response to Asacol and other forms of 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-ASA) is better correlated with tissue concentrations and best predicted by concentrations of the drug within the lumen of the colon. Our group used computer simulation to predict colonic 5-ASA levels after Asacol administration. In our study, the model simulated Asacol distribution in the healthy colon, and during quiescent and active ulcerative colitis. An Asacol dosage of 800 mg, three times a day, was compared to 2400 mg given once a day. Under ideal conditions, the predicted maximum drug in the total colon and individual colonic segments over 100 d differed by less than 3% between single and multiple doses. Despite changes in motility and defection rates, the predicted maximum and average 5-ASA concentrations in the total colon and individual colonic segments differed by less than 10% between dosing regimens. Asymmetric distribution of 5-ASA in the colon was influenced by frequency of bowel movements and colonic transit rate. In active colitis, sigmoid 5-ASA concentration becomes negligible. Our model supports once daily administration of Asacol as standard treatment for ulcerative colitis.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, BiologicalAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalColitis, UlcerativeColonDrug Administration ScheduleHumansMesalamineTissue DistributionTreatment OutcomeAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalMesalamine

Identifiers

PMID20039462
PMCPMC2799911
OpenAlexW1512064773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.