Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20039397›Full record

Trial reportArthritis and rheumatism2010

Immunization responses in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with rituximab: results from a controlled clinical trial.

Clifton O Bingham, R John Looney, Atul Deodhar, Neal Halsey, Maria Greenwald, Christine Codding, Benjamin Trzaskoma, Flavius Martin, Sunil Agarwal, Ariella Kelman

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Arthritis and rheumatism, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 191 papers, 17 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
191citing papers in PubMed, 17 pooled it
16.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

191 citing papers in PubMed, 17 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 459 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Guideline
  7. Pooled it
  8. Guideline
  9. Guideline
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Guideline
  14. Rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

131 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Clifton O BinghamDivision of Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21224, USA. Clifton.bingham@jhmi.edu
R John Looney
Atul Deodhar
Neal Halsey
Maria Greenwald
Christine Codding
Benjamin Trzaskoma
Flavius Martin
Sunil Agarwal
Ariella Kelman
Johns Hopkins University · USDesert Medical Imaging · USOregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · USUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine immunization responses in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with rituximab and to investigate the effects of rituximab-induced CD20+ B cell depletion on immune responses to tetanus toxoid (T cell-dependent antigen), pneumococcal polysaccharide (T cell-independent antigen), and keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) (neoantigen) and on delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH).

methodsIn a controlled trial, we enrolled 103 patients with active RA receiving a stable dose of methotrexate (MTX). Tetanus toxoid, pneumococcal polysaccharide, and KLH vaccines as well as a Candida albicans skin test were administered to 1 group of patients receiving rituximab plus MTX (called rituximab-treated patients) for 36 weeks and to 1 group of patients receiving MTX alone for 12 weeks. The primary end point was the proportion of patients with a >or=4-fold rise in antitetanus IgG levels. Antitetanus, antipneumococcal, and anti-KLH serum IgG levels were measured prior to and 4 weeks following vaccine administration. The DTH response to C albicans was measured 2-3 days following placement.

resultsResponses to tetanus toxoid vaccine (>or=4-fold rise) were similar in both groups (39.1% of rituximab-treated patients and 42.3% of patients treated with MTX alone). The ability to maintain a positive DTH response to the C albicans skin test was comparable in both groups (77.4% of rituximab-treated patients and 70% of patients treated with MTX alone), showing no effect of rituximab treatment. Rituximab-treated patients had decreased responses to pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (57% of patients had a 2-fold rise in titer in response to >or=1 serotype, compared with 82% of patients treated with MTX alone) and to KLH vaccine (47% of patients had detectable anti-KLH IgG, compared with 93% of patients treated with MTX alone).

conclusionRecall responses to the T cell-dependent protein antigen tetanus toxoid as well as DTH responses were preserved in rituximab-treated RA patients 24 weeks after treatment. Responses to neoantigen (KLH) and T cell-independent responses to pneumococcal vaccine were decreased, but many patients were able to mount responses. These data suggest that polysaccharide and primary immunizations should be administered prior to rituximab infusions to maximize responses.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAntibody FormationAntigens, CD20Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidB-Lymphocyte SubsetsDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHemocyaninsHumansHypersensitivity, DelayedImmunologic MemoryAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAntigens, CD20Antirheumatic AgentsHemocyaninsInfluenza Vaccineskeyhole-limpet hemocyaninMethotrexatePneumococcal VaccinesRituximabTetanus ToxoidVaccines

Identifiers

PMID20039397
OpenAlexW2042927558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.