Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20039119›Full record

ArticleChromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology2010

The Ty1-copia families SALIRE and Cotzilla populating the Beta vulgaris genome show remarkable differences in abundance, chromosomal distribution, and age.

Beatrice Weber, Torsten Wenke, Ulrike Frömmel, Thomas Schmidt, Tony Heitkam

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Beatrice WeberDepartment of Biology, Dresden University of Technology, Germany.
Torsten Wenke
Ulrike Frömmel
Thomas Schmidt
Tony Heitkam

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons are major components of plant genomes influencing genome size and evolution. Using two separate approaches, we identified the Ty1-copia retrotransposon families Cotzilla and SALIRE in the Beta vulgaris (sugar beet) genome. While SALIRE elements are similar to typical Ty1-copia retrotransposons, Cotzilla elements belong to a lineage called Sireviruses. Hallmarks of Cotzilla retrotransposons are the existence of an additional putative env-like open reading frame upstream of the 3'LTR, an extended gag region, and a frameshift separating the gag and pol genes. Detected in a c ( 0 ) t-1 DNA library, Cotzilla elements belong to the most abundant retrotransposon families in B. vulgaris and are relatively homogenous and evolutionarily young. In contrast, the SALIRE family has relatively few copies, is diverged, and most likely ancient. As revealed by fluorescent in situ hybridization, SALIRE elements target predominantly gene-rich euchromatic regions, while Cotzilla retrotransposons are abundant in the intercalary and pericentromeric heterochromatin. The analysis of two retrotransposons from the same subclass contrasting in abundance, age, sequence diversity, and localization gives insight in the heterogeneity of LTR retrotransposons populating a plant genome.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, PlantRetroelementsBeta vulgarisPhylogenyTerminal Repeat SequencesRetroelements

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.