Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20037793›Full record

ReviewPituitary2010

Pituitary function in subjects with mild traumatic brain injury: a review of literature and proposal of a screening strategy.

Fatih Tanriverdi, Kursad Unluhizarci, Fahrettin Kelestimur

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pituitary, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fatih TanriverdiDepartment of Endocrinology, Erciyes University Medical School, 38039 Kayseri, Turkey.
Kursad Unluhizarci
Fahrettin Kelestimur

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an important public health problem all over the world. The level of consciousness of the patients and the severity of the brain injury is commonly evaluated by the Glascow Coma Scale as mild, moderate and severe TBI. When we consider the high frequency of mild TBI (MTBI) among the all TBI patients the burden of the pituitary dysfunction problem in this group could not be ignored. However, one of the most important and still unresolved questions is which patients with MTBI should be screened for hypopituitarism? Another type of head trauma which could be considered as the subgroup of MTBI is sports related chronic repetitive head trauma. Therefore, in this review we will discuss the frequency, characteristics and current management of pituitary dysfunction in patients with MTBI including the subjects exposed to sports related chronic mild head trauma.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesHuman Growth HormoneHumansHypopituitarismPituitary GlandHuman Growth Hormone

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.