Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20037682›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2009

Predictive value and utility of oral steroid testing for treatment of COPD in primary care: the COOPT study.

Niels H Chavannes, Tjard R J Schermer, Emiel F M Wouters, Reinier P Akkermans, Richard P N Dekhuijzen, Jean W M Muris, Chris van Weel, Onno C P van Schayck

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Inhaled corticosteroids for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Niels H ChavannesDepartment of Public health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands. n.h.chavannes@lumc.nl
Tjard R J Schermer
Emiel F M Wouters
Reinier P Akkermans
Richard P N Dekhuijzen
Jean W M Muris
Chris van Weel
Onno C P van Schayck

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe oral prednisolone test is widely used to distinguish chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients who might benefit from inhaled steroid treatment. Previous studies used selected patient groups that did not represent the large COPD population in primary care.

methodsThe study included smokers and exsmokers with chronic bronchitis or COPD from primary care, who underwent prednisolone testing (30 mg for 14 days) before randomization in a three-year follow-up randomized controlled trial (COOPT Study). Spirometry was performed before and after the test. Responders and nonresponders were classified according to international criteria. Effectiveness of inhaled fluticasone relative to placebo was compared in terms of health status (Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire), exacerbations, and postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)), using repeated measurement analysis.

resultsTwo hundred eighty-six patients recruited from 44 primary care practices were randomized. Nine percent to 16% of the COPD population was classified as responder, depending on the international guideline criteria used. On average, responders did not reach the minimum clinically important difference in health status (0.29 points/year, P = 0.05), although a borderline significant effect of inhaled fluticasone was noted. Possible clinically relevant reductions in exacerbation rate (rate ratio 0.67) and FEV(1) decline (39 mL/year) occurred in responders, but did not reach statistical significance.

conclusionsOral steroid testing identifies a limited proportion of COPD patients, but does not reveal any clinically relevant benefit from inhaled steroid treatment on health status. No significant effects on exacerbation rate and lung function decline occurred.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultAgedFemaleGlucocorticoidsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient SelectionPredictive Value of TestsPrednisolonePrimary Health CarePulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveGlucocorticoidsPrednisoloneCOPDoral steroid testingprednisolone testprimary care

Identifiers

PMID20037682
PMCPMC2793071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.