Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20036612›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in plant biology2010

Omics meet networks - using systems approaches to infer regulatory networks in plants.

Miguel A Moreno-Risueno, Wolfgang Busch, Philip N Benfey

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in plant biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
16.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 142 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Network-based approaches for understanding gene regulation and function in plants.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Miguel A Moreno-RisuenoDuke University, Department of Biology and Center for Systems Biology, USA.
Wolfgang Busch
Philip N Benfey
Center for Systems Biology · US

Funding

Project 6P50GM081883 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BENFEY, PHILIP N · 2007 to 2012
$14.9M
MOLECULAR GENETIC ANALYSIS OF ROOT MORPHOGENESISR01GM043778 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI BENFEY, PHILIP N · 1991 to 2017
$5.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM081883NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM043778
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many genomic-scale datasets in plants have been generated over the last few years. This substantial achievement has led to impressive progress, including some of the most detailed molecular maps in any multicellular organism. Networks and pathways have been reconstructed using transcriptome, genome-wide transcription factor binding, proteome and metabolome data, and subsequently used to infer functional interactions among genes, proteins, and metabolites. However, more sophisticated systems biology approaches are needed to integrate different omics datasets. Ultimately, the integration of diverse and massive datasets into coherent models will improve our understanding of the molecular networks that underlie biological processes.

Indexed as

Systems BiologyGene Expression Regulation, PlantGene Regulatory NetworksGenomicsPlantsTranscription FactorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID20036612
PMCPMC2862083
OpenAlexW2077438398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.