Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20035363›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2010

A comparative view of insect circadian clock systems.

Kenji Tomioka, Akira Matsumoto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Uncovering the circadian transcriptome ofProceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Social synchronization of circadian rhythms with a focus on honeybees.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  17. The Circadian Clock in Lepidoptera.Frontiers in physiology · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Recent advances in modulators of circadian rhythms: an update and perspective.Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2020
    Review
  20. Light input pathways to the circadian clock of insects with an emphasis on the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kenji TomiokaGraduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8530, Japan. tomioka@cc.okayama-u.ac.jp
Akira Matsumoto

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies revealed that the neuronal network controlling overt rhythms shows striking similarity in various insect orders. The pigment-dispersing factor seems commonly involved in regulating locomotor activity. However, there are considerable variations in the molecular oscillatory mechanism, and input and output pathways among insects. In Drosophila, autoregulatory negative feedback loops that consist of clock genes, such as period and timeless are believed to create 24-h rhythmicity. Although similar clock genes have been found in some insects, the behavior of their product proteins shows considerable differences from that of Drosophila. In other insects, mammalian-type cryptochrome (cry2) seems to work as a transcriptional repressor in the feedback loop. For photic entrainment, Drosophila type cryptochrome (cry1) plays the major role in Drosophila while the compound eyes are the major photoreceptor in others. Further comparative study will be necessary to understand how this variety of clock mechanisms derived from an ancestral one.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological ClocksCircadian RhythmCryptochromesFeedback, PhysiologicalGenes, InsectHumansInsectaInsect ProteinsLightMolecular Sequence DataMotor ActivityPhotoperiodPhotoreceptor Cells, InvertebrateTemperatureCryptochromesInsect Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20035363
PMCPMC11115600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.