ArticleSurgical endoscopy2010
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial evaluation of a large series of patients.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
79 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Remains of the day: biliary complications related to single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of prospective randomized studies comparing single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) and conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CMLC).Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2012Pooled it
- Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review.Surgical endoscopy · 2011Pooled it
- The role of single-incision laparoscopic surgery in abdominal and pelvic surgery: a systematic review.Surgical endoscopy · 2011Pooled it
- A randomized controlled trial comparing post-operative pain in single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.World journal of surgery · 2015Trial
- Patient-reported outcomes after single-incision versus traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized prospective trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2013Trial
- Single-port cholecystectomy versus multi-port cholecystectomy: a prospective cohort study with 222 patients.World journal of surgery · 2013Trial
- Randomized clinical study for assessment of incision characteristics and pain associated with LESS versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2013Trial
- Single-incision vs three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective randomized study.World journal of gastroenterology · 2013Trial
- Pre-bent instruments used in single-port laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery: comparative study of performance in a dry lab.Surgical endoscopy · 2012Trial
- A randomized comparison of laparoscopic, magnetically anchored, and flexible endoscopic cameras in performance and workload between laparoscopic and single-incision surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2012Trial
- A Comprehensive Analysis of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Trends, Challenges, and Future Directions.Cureus · 2024Review
- Neural Network-Based Active Load-Sensing Scheme and Stiffness Adjustment for Pneumatic Soft Actuators for Minimally Invasive Surgery Support.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Single-incision laparoscopic splenectomy in children with massive splenomegaly: A prospective, monocentric pilot study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- A large-cohort comparison between single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy from a single center; 2080 cases.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2018Article
- Evolution of the Konyang Standard Method for single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the result from a thousand case of a single center experience.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2018Article
- Single-site robotic cholecystectomy: comparison of clinical outcome and the learning curves in relation to surgeon experience in a community teaching hospital.BMC surgery · 2018Article
- Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using instrumental alignment in robotic single-site cholecystectomy.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2018Article
- Feasibility and safety of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly patients: A single institution, retrospective case series.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2017Article
- Single-Port Laparoscopic Liver Resection: Largest Turkish Experience.The Indian journal of surgery · 2017Article
19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFindings have shown that single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) is feasible and reproducible. The authors have pioneered a two-trocar SILC technique at the University of Texas Southwestern. Their results for 100 patients are presented.
methodsFrom January 2008 to March 2009, 100 patients with symptomatic gallbladder disease underwent SILC through a 1.5- to 2-cm umbilical incision using a two-port (5-mm) technique. For nearly all the patients, a 30 degrees angled scope was used. The gallbladder was retracted, with two or three sutures placed along the gallbladder. These sutures were either fixated internally or placed through the abdominal wall to obtain a critical view of Calot's triangle. The SILC procedure was performed using standard technique with 5-mm reticulating or conventional laparoscopic instruments. The cystic duct and artery were well visualized, clipped, and divided. Cholecystectomy was completed with electrocautery, and the specimen was retrieved through the umbilical incision.
resultsIn this series, 80 women (85%) and 15 men (15%) with an average age of 33.8 years (range, 17-66 years) underwent SILC. Their mean BMI was 29.8 kg/m(2) (range, 17-42.5 kg/m(2)), and 39% of these patients had undergone previous abdominal surgery. The mean operative time was 50.8 min (range, 23-120 min). The mean estimated blood loss was 22.3 ml (range, 5-125 ml), and 5% of the patients had an intraoperative cholangiogram. There were no conversions of the SILC technique. A two-trocar technique was feasible for 87% of the patients. For the remaining patients, either a three-channel port or three individual trocars were required. A SILC technique was used for 5% of the patients to manage acute cholecystitis or gallstone pancreatitis.
conclusionThe SILC technique with a two-trocar technique is safe, feasible, and reproducible. The operating times are reasonable and can be lessened with experience. Even complex cases can be managed with this technique. Excellent exposure of the critical view was obtained in all cases. The SILC procedure is becoming the standard of care for most of the authors' elective patients with gallbladder disease. Clinical trials are warranted before the SILC technique is adopted universally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.