Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20034615›Full record

Trial reportBiological psychiatry2010

Diminished neural processing of aversive and rewarding stimuli during selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment.

Ciara McCabe, Zevic Mishor, Philip J Cowen, Catherine J Harmer

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Biological psychiatry, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03966859 (The Effect of Seven-Day Atorvastatin Administration on Emotional Processing, Reward Processing, and Inflammation in Healthy Volunteers), which is not on this map. Cited by 176 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
176citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
14.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03966859 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Seven-Day Atorvastatin Administration on Emotional Processing, Reward Processing, and Inflammation in Healthy Volunteers

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OxfordRan2019 to 2020Enrolled50ConditionsHealthyArmsAtorvastatin 20mg, Lactose placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

176 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 361 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Citalopram versus other anti-depressive agents for depression.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Chronic escitalopram in healthy volunteers has specific effects on reinforcement sensitivity: a double-blind, placebo-controlled semi-randomised study.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Striatal activation to monetary reward is associated with alcohol reward sensitivity.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2021
    Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Striatal dopamine D2/3 receptor-mediated neurotransmission in major depression: Implications for anhedonia, anxiety and treatment response.European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2017
    Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

116 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ciara McCabeDepartment of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7JX, United Kingdom. ciara.mccabe@psych.ox.ac.uk
Zevic Mishor
Philip J Cowen
Catherine J Harmer
Warneford Hospital · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0800905
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are popular medications for anxiety and depression, but their effectiveness, particularly in patients with prominent symptoms of loss of motivation and pleasure, has been questioned. There are few studies of the effect of SSRIs on neural reward mechanisms in humans.

methodsWe studied 45 healthy participants who were randomly allocated to receive the SSRI citalopram, the noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor reboxetine, or placebo for 7 days in a double-blind, parallel group design. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to measure the neural response to rewarding (sight and/or flavor of chocolate) and aversive stimuli (sight of moldy strawberries and/or an unpleasant strawberry taste) on the final day of drug treatment.

resultsCitalopram reduced activation to the chocolate stimuli in the ventral striatum and the ventral medial/orbitofrontal cortex. In contrast, reboxetine did not suppress ventral striatal activity and in fact increased neural responses within medial orbitofrontal cortex to reward. Citalopram also decreased neural responses to the aversive stimuli conditions in key "punishment" areas such as the lateral orbitofrontal cortex. Reboxetine produced a similar, although weaker effect.

conclusionsOur findings are the first to show that treatment with SSRIs can diminish the neural processing of both rewarding and aversive stimuli. The ability of SSRIs to decrease neural responses to reward might underlie the questioned efficacy of SSRIs in depressive conditions characterized by decreased motivation and anhedonia and could also account for the experience of emotional blunting described by some patients during SSRI treatment.

Indexed as

RewardAdrenergic Uptake InhibitorsAdultAffectAnxiety DisordersCitalopramDepressive DisorderDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMorpholinesNerve NetReboxetineSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsYoung AdultAdrenergic Uptake InhibitorsCitalopramMorpholinesReboxetineSelective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID20034615
PMCPMC2828549
OpenAlexW1992103170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.