ArticleComparative medicine2009
Using multidetector computed tomography in a swine model to assess the effects of sublingual nitroglycerin and intravenous adenosine on epicardial coronary arteries.
Article in Comparative medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- The impact of spinal anesthesia on cardiac function in euvolemic vascular surgery patients: insights from echocardiography and biomarkers.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2024Article
- Impact of sublingual nitroglycerin dosage on FFREuropean radiology · 2019Article
- Improved enhancement in CT angiography with reduced contrast media iodine concentrations at constant iodine dose.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- The Impact of Combining a Low-Tube Voltage Acquisition with Iterative Reconstruction on Total Iodine Dose in Coronary CT Angiography.BioMed research international · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines the effects of intravenous infusion of adenosine and sublingual nitroglycerin on coronary angiograms obtained by current-generation multidetector computed tomography. We assessed coronary vasodilation at baseline and after intravenous adenosine (140 microg/kg/min) or sublingual nitroglycerin spray (800 microg) in 7 female swine (weight, 40.9 +/- 1.4 kg) by using electrocardiogram-gated coronary angiography with a 64-detector scanner (rotation time, 400 ms; 120kV; 400 mA) and intravenous contrast (300 mg/mL iohexol, 4.5 mL/s, 2 mL/kg). Cross-sectional areas of segments in the left anterior descending, circumflex, and right coronary arteries were evaluated in oblique orthogonal views. Images were acquired at an average heart rate of 73 +/- 11 beats per minute. Changes in aortic pressure were not significant with nitroglycerin but decreased (approximately 10%) with adenosine. Of the 76 segments analyzed (baseline range, 2 to 39 mm2), 1 distal segment could not be assessed after adenosine. Segment cross-sectional area increased by 11.3% with nitroglycerin but decreased by 9.6% during adenosine infusion. The results of the present study are consistent with the practice of using sublingual nitroglycerin to enhance visualization of epicardial vessels and suggest that intravenous adenosine may hinder coronary artery visualization. This study is the first repeated-measures electrocardiogram-gated CT evaluation to use the same imaging technology to assess changes in coronary cross-sectional area before and after treatment with a vasodilator. The nitroglycerin-associated changes in our swine model were modest in comparison with previously reported human studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20034433PMC2798844W233131012What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.