ArticleNeuroradiology2010
Influence of carotid artery stenting on cognitive function.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- The stronger one-sided relative hypoperfusion, the more pronounced ipsilateral spatial attentional bias in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2020Trial
- Effect of carotid artery stenting on cerebral blood flow: evaluation of hemodynamic changes using arterial spin labeling.Neuroradiology · 2013Trial
- Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Cognitive Function: Treating the Heart, Altering the Brain?Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team · 2025Article
- Carotid Artery Stenting Intervention to Enhance Global Brain Blood Flow and Cognition in Carotid Artery Disease: Preliminary Findings from a Prospective Follow-Up MRI Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Unveiling the influence of lateralized carotid artery revascularization on cognitive function: a comparative analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Carotid Stenosis and Stroke: Medicines, Stents, Surgery-"Wait-and-See" or Protect?Thrombosis and haemostasis · 2024Article
- Changes in Cognitive Functions after Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Stenting: A Decade-Apart Comparison.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- Cognitive functions and sense of coherence in patients with carotid artery stenosis-Preliminary report.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Cognitive Functions after Carotid Artery Stenting-1-Year Follow-Up Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Cognitive Functions in Patients after Carotid Artery Revascularization-A Narrative Review.Brain sciences · 2021Review
- Flow-metabolism uncoupling in patients with asymptomatic unilateral carotid artery stenosis assessed by multi-modal magnetic resonance imaging.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2019Article
- Silent brain infarcts on diffusion-weighted imaging after carotid revascularisation: A surrogate outcome measure for procedural stroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis.European stroke journal · 2019Article
- Is Hemispheric Hypoperfusion a Treatable Cause of Cognitive Impairment?Current cardiology reports · 2019Review
- Changes in Cognition, Depression and Quality of Life after Carotid Stenosis Treatment.Current neurovascular research · 2019Observational
- Magnetic resonance imaging and clinical outcome in patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis after carotid artery revascularization.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2017Article
- One swallow does not a summer make but many swallows do: accumulating clinical evidence for nearly-eliminated peri-procedural and 30-day complications with mesh-covered stents transforms the carotid revascularisation field.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2017Review
- Intervention versus Aggressive Medical Therapy for Cognition in Severe Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2016Article
- Effect of carotid artery stenting on cognitive function in patients with carotid artery stenosis: a prospective, 3-month-follow-up study.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2015Article
- Neurocognitive functioning after carotid revascularization: a systematic review.Cerebrovascular diseases extra · 2014Review
- Cognitive Performance following Carotid Endarterectomy or Stenting in Asymptomatic Patients with Severe ICA Stenosis.Cardiovascular psychiatry and neurology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThere have only been a few studies on cognitive changes in patients with carotid occlusive disease, and the results of these show major discrepancies in the extent to which treatment affects neuropsychological function. We sought to clarify these discrepancies by evaluating the effects of carotid artery stenting (CAS) on the cognitive function.
methodsForty-one asymptomatic CAS patients were administered a test battery of neuropsychological tests measuring cognitive speed and memory function before and 3 months after the procedure. A control group was also evaluated. To test for thromboembolic lesions, diffusion-weighted imaging was used.
resultsCAS led to a significant increase in cognitive speed (p<0.001) but did not afford any change in memory function. This was regardless of the degree or side of stenosis or patient age or gender.
conclusionCAS significantly improved functions that involve cognitive speed. Earlier studies did not differentiate between speed and memory tests and thus might have missed these changes. Further studies correlating changes in brain perfusion with increase in cognitive speed are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20033798What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.