ArticleSurgical endoscopy2010
Laparoscopic surgery for stage IV colorectal cancer.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Metagenome Sequencing Reveals the Midgut Microbiota Makeup ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Factors related to short-term outcomes and delayed systemic treatment following primary tumor resection for asymptomatic stage IV colorectal cancer.International journal of colorectal disease · 2020Article
- Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for primary tumor resection in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer with unresectable metastasis.Surgery today · 2015Article
- Palliative care and end-stage colorectal cancer management: the surgeon meets the oncologist.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Review
- Potential value of sonazoid-enhanced intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasonography for liver assessment during laparoscopy-assisted colectomy.Surgery today · 2014Article
- Article
- A recommended laparoscopic procedure for implantation of microcapsules in the peritoneal cavity of non-human primates.The Journal of surgical research · 2011Article
- Exploring indications for laparoscopic primary tumor resection in metastatic colorectal cancer.Surgical endoscopy · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe role of laparoscopic surgery in the management of stage IV colorectal cancer remains uncertain.
methodsSixty-five patients with stage IV disease from among 578 colorectal cancer patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery since 2001 were compared with 513 patients who had stage 0-III disease. The criteria for excluding stage IV patients from laparoscopic surgery were huge tumors, low rectal cancer, massive ascites due to peritoneal seeding, bowel perforation and/or obstruction, and poor general condition and/or cachexia. Data were analyzed by chi-square test or Student's t-test, with P < 0.05 being considered significant.
resultsThe two groups of patients had similar demographic features. The open conversion rate was 4.6% (3/65 patients) in the stage IV group and 2.7% (14/513 patients) in the stage 0-III group, and the difference between the groups was not significant. In the stage IV group, depth of tumor invasion and tumor diameter were both significantly greater than in the stage 0-III group. However, operating time and blood loss were similar in the two groups (stage IV: 189.0 min and 95.0 g; stage 0-III: 182.5 min and 60.0 g), although blood loss was significantly greater in the stage IV group when patients undergoing rectal surgery were compared. The incidence of postoperative complications and the postoperative course of the two groups were similar.
conclusionsDespite their larger and more invasive tumors, the short-term outcome of laparoscopic surgery in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer was similar to that for stage 0-III patients. This result indicates that laparoscopic surgery can be successfully performed in selected stage IV colorectal cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.