Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20033338›Full record

Trial reportJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2010

Significance of limited hiatal dissection in surgery for achalasia.

Aleksandar Petar Simić, Nebojsa S Radovanović, Ognjan M Skrobić, Zoran J Raznatović, Predrag M Pesko

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Fundoplication in laparoscopic Heller's cardiomyotomy for achalasia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Surgical management of achalasia.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Early clinical experience with the POEM procedure for achalasia.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie · 2015
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal primary motility disorders: analysis of 100 consecutive patients.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2015
    Article
  18. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia.Annals of translational medicine · 2014
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aleksandar Petar SimićDepartment for Esophagogastric Surgery, First Surgical University Hospital, Clinical Center of Serbia, Koste Todorovića St 6, 11.000 Belgrade, Serbia. apsimic@med.bg.ac.rs
Nebojsa S Radovanović
Ognjan M Skrobić
Zoran J Raznatović
Predrag M Pesko
University of Belgrade · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIt is speculated that postoperative pathologic gastroesophageal reflux after Heller's myotomy can be diminished if the lateral and posterior phrenoesophageal attachments are left intact. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of limited hiatal dissection in patients operated due to achalasia.

methodsProspective, randomized, 3 years follow-up of 84 patients operated due to achalasia. In 26 patients, Heller-Dor with complete hiatal dissection was done (G1), limited hiatal dissection combined with myotomy and Dor's procedure was performed in 36 patients (G2), and with Heller's myotomy alone in 22 (G3). Stationary manometry and 24 h pH study were performed in regular postoperative intervals.

resultsPostoperatively, higher median values of lower esophageal sphincter resting pressures were marked in G2 and G3, while patients in G1 were presented with higher median values of pH acid score (p < 0.001). Abnormal DeMeester score 3 years after surgery was present in 23.1% of patients in G1 and 8.5% and 9.1% in G2 and G3 accordingly. There was no statistical difference between the groups concerning postoperative dysphagia recurrence.

conclusionIndicating further long-term studies, 3 years after the operation limited hiatal dissection compared to complete obtains better reflux control in achalasia patients, regardless of Dor's fundoplication.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceEsophageal AchalasiaEsophageal pH MonitoringEsophagoscopyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFundoplicationGastroesophageal RefluxHumansMaleManometryMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesStatistics, NonparametricTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID20033338
OpenAlexW2004338994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.